• Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    But then with how partisan judges are now, you would get completely random rulings. Better than what we have now I guess, but in theory you could have two landmark cases against, for example, Roe v Wade, and the SC might handle these challenges completely differently depending on composition.

    • Seraph@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Would it not leave the door open for more cases to be revisited with such randomness?