Lots here, but these are the juicy parts:

Donald Trump’s running mate, JD Vance, said that professional women “choose a path to misery” when they prioritize careers over having children in a September 2021 podcast interview in which he also claimed men in America were “suppressed” in their masculinity.

The Ohio senator and vice-presidential candidate said of women like his classmates at Yale Law School that “pursuing racial or gender equity is like the value system that gives their life meaning … [but] they all find that that value system leads to misery”.

Vance also sideswiped the Minnesota congresswoman Ilhan Omar, a one-time Somali refugee, claiming she had shown “ingratitude” to America, and that she “would be living in a craphole” had she not moved to the US.

Of Afghans who assisted US troops during the occupation of that country who were now seeking to come to America, Vance asked whether “certain groups of people can successfully become American citizens”, and said those hostile to Minneapolis’s Somali American community “don’t like people getting hatcheted in the street in [their] own community”.

At the same time, Vance claimed that “the left uses racism as a cudgel”, and that he had been a “little too worried” in the past about such accusations because they can be “career-ending” and “destroy a person’s life”.

At about 39 minutes into the recording, when asked what he saw inside elite institutions like Yale Law School that made him view them as corrupt, Vance answered: “You have women who think that truly the liberationist path is to spend 90 hours a week working in a cubicle at McKinsey instead of starting a family and having children.”

Vance added: “What they don’t realize – and I think some of them do eventually realize that, thank God – is that that is actually a path to misery. And the path to happiness and to fulfillment is something that these institutions are telling people not to do.

“The corruption is it puts people on a career pipeline that causes them to chase things that will make them miserable and unhappy,” Vance said. “And so they get in positions of power and then they project that misery and happiness on the rest of society.”

Minutes later, Vance adopted the perspective of a hypothetical professional woman to answer Sharma’s question about where “the racial and gender resentment comes from”.

“OK, clearly, this value set has made me a miserable person who can’t have kids because I already passed the biological period when it was possible,” Vance began, “And I live in a 1,200 sq ft apartment in New York and I pay $5,000 a month for it.”

He continued: “But I’m really better than these other people. What I’m going to do is project my, like, racial and gender sensitivities on the rest of them … even though the way that I think has made me a miserable person, I just need to make more people think like that.”

On the other hand, Vance depicted men and boys as “suppressed”, saying 52 minutes in that “one of the weird things about elite society is it’s deeply uncomfortable with masculinity”.

Warming to the theme, Vance said: “This is one weird thing that conservatives don’t talk about enough … We don’t talk enough about the fact that traditional masculine traits are now actively suppressed from childhood all the way through adulthood.”

Assessing his young son’s habit of fighting imaginary monsters, Vance said: “There’s something deeply cultural and biological, spiritual about this desire to defend his home and his family.”

He connected this with a hypothetical invasion: “If the Chinese invade us in 10 years, they’re going to be beaten back by boys like you who practice fighting the monsters who become proud men who defend their homes.”

By contrast, for Vance, “They’re not going to be defended by the soy boys who want to feed the monsters.”

At about 22 minutes into the recording, Vance mocked the claims of Afghan refugees to have helped the US military in its occupation, saying: “Apparently, Afghanistan is a country of translators and interpreters because every single person that’s coming in, that’s what they say is this person is: a translator and interpreter.”

He attributed the idea that the US should grant asylum to those who helped US forces to “the fraudulence of our elites”, saying: “You talk to people who served in Afghanistan. And one of the things they will tell you is, yeah, a lot of the translators and interpreters who helped us were great guys.”

Vance added, however, that “a lot of the interpreters who said they were helping us were actively helping terrorists plant roadside bombs, knowing our routes”, without substantiating the claim.

Vance continued: “The idea that every person in Afghanistan, even those who said they were helping us, are actually good people is a total joke.”

Vance expressed similar skepticism about another immigrant group, while characterizing himself and others as victims of the left.

At about 25 minutes into the recording, Solheim said: “There’s like a whole section of downtown Minneapolis that they call Little Mogadishu. Like that’s what they call it. There’s nothing in English. People are frequently hatcheted to death in the street.”

Solheim added: “I was just down there a couple of weeks ago. It’s like a totally different country.”

Replying, Vance said: “The thing that I hate about this is the left uses racism as a cudgel. And I myself was guilty of being a little worried about that. Like, I don’t want to be called a racist because I knew it can be career-ending and they can destroy a person’s life.”

Vance then asked, rhetorically, “Why don’t you want, you know, people getting hatcheted in the street in downtown Minneapolis? Is it because you’re a racist or is it because you don’t like people getting hatcheted in the street in your own community?”

“Like, obviously, the answer is the latter,” he concluded. “But the left uses racism as a cudgel to shut us up and to make it impossible to complain about obvious problems.”

Last July, not long after being named as Trump’s VP pick, Vance suggested in a speech that Democrats would describe drinking Diet Mountain Dew as racist. The comment backfired and was widely mocked.

At about 28 minutes in, Sharma said: “You know, thinking about the Minnesota example, specifically, that’s how you get someone like Ilhan Omar, who despises the country.”

Vance replied, “I mean, [the US] gave her an incredible amount of opportunity and she has a complete lack of gratitude,” later adding: “My family has been here as far as I can tell for nine, 10, like many generations. I’ve never heard a person in my family express the ingratitude towards this country that Ilhan Omar does towards this country.

“And look, this is the way the laws work. This country belongs to Ilhan Omar in the same way that it belongs to me,” Vance allowed.

“But my God, show a little appreciation for the fact that you would be living in a craphole if this country didn’t bring you to a place that has obviously its problems, but has a lot of prosperity, too,” he concluded.

Vance also talked about institutions like universities and the media as components of a “broken elite system”, and portrayed their inhabitants as enemies whom conservatives would need to reckon with.

“There is no way for a conservative to accomplish our vision of society unless we’re willing to strike at the heart of the beast. That’s the universities.”

  • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Source? Not being lazy, I just spent a few minutes poking around articles and I can’t find anything indicating that.

    It is true that white women have historically voted Republican for over half century, but “the biggest voting bloc for Trump”? I’m pretty sure that’s white men. Especially after the recent shifts in the suburbs

      • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’m still not seeing numbers showing white women turn out in a raw higher number for Trump than white men do. We can’t just assume that the turnout difference would be enough to overcome the per capita difference.

        I already said in my comment that white women have historically skewed Republican. That’s not really what we are debating.

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          White voters have the highest turnout by nearly double digits, and white women consistently turn out about 5% more than white men. Combine this with the fact that women are about 52% of the population and the math is clear.

            • cygnus@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              That is an awful lot of imprecise napkin math

              Perhaps. Worst case, white women are a VERY close second (~1%) behind white men as being the most important GOP voting cohort. Losing even single-digit percentages of their vote is a death sentence.

                • cygnus@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  In the absence of official stats, my napkin math suggests they are the biggest. As I said, it’s possible they are a very, very close second. I don’t see why you’re so up in arms about this.

                  • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    I’m not up an arms I just don’t accept statements treated as fact based on imprecise estimates and a slew of assumptions. I’ve been calm and had a discussion with you. If that’s an issue we can move on