Lol u stole the Arch mantra… I use arch btw.
Ubuntu mantra should be something else like “snaps are my homies”
Lol u stole the Arch mantra… I use arch btw.
Ubuntu mantra should be something else like “snaps are my homies”
Prosecuting Assange is a blow against freedom of press.
Sorry I can’t get passed the paywall.
This article doesn’t even mention Assange’s name.
I just read the whole wiki on assange, didn’t see anything about selective leaking or any bias from him.
Could you please provide sauce for this claim?
Assange is a brilliant man and a hacktivist from what I read.
Removed by mod
Bro clip your nails ffs
Haha, I had to read it 3 times to figure out what the heck he was saying.
I had to read this 3 times to figure out your angle.
What are the significance of those ports?
Agreed 100%.
Also Assange is a whistleblower and is in jail for it… Sad.
Lmao
because [the moratorium] only applied to police
Fuck bezos and fuck amazon
Yes. Like a heavy armor plated Lamborghini.
Lol OK buddy, I went to school for this and worked in a power plant.
I concede that it is exponential and not logarithmic, but the original statement of yours “loses its harm exponentially” is what got us going down this tangent. I think that statement is misleading, because the truth is that the waste loses its harm exponentially slower as time goes on.
Exponential decay is not the same as “exponentially losing its harm”
It very slowly “loses its harm” and as time progresses, it gets even slower.
The inverse of an exponential function is still an exponential function.
This link shows that the number of nuclides decreases at a slower rate as time goes on. Opposite of an exponential function.
As time progresses the rate at which the nuclear waste decays into innert matter is slower and slower. This is not at all an exponential rate.
So I don’t think it’s correct to say “loses its harm exponentially.”
It “loses its harm” more slowly as time goes on
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-physics/chapter/31-5-half-life-and-activity/
I could be wrong but I thought rate of decay was a logarithmic function, not exponential.
I’ve been guilty of this… I justify it in my head by saying:
it took me 5 hours to automate a 1-hr manual task, but hey, with this practice maybe next time I’ll get it done in 4 hours, then 3, and so on until I can do it in less time than the manual task would take.
Holographic displays