Point missed twice, impressive.
I admire the time you have dedicated to whooshing and misinterpretation, you have become highly-skilled.
Point missed.
He/she’s dead, Jim.
Kids ain’t even know how to spell patwa, I feel u tho cuz I’m cool af. Fr fr.
$rm cli args make the best slang.
Noooooo, I just wanna make people leaky… FINE! I’ll commit social-murder, but I won’t be happy about it. (grumbles) Gna go play my rogue in Oblivion gonna stab everybody… (Harumph…)
I’m rich and I love stabbing. Stop excluding me from your straw men arguments.
Whatever you have available to start, once you’re up and running make small upgrades based on your needs and use-case. Starting is key, just my 2¥.
Disclaimer Edit: I realize there are some semantics between force, weight, mass, etc. The purpose of this post is not the rigor of the mathematics but the enjoy-ability of being able to abstract interesting measurements. Sorry if I made any mistakes physicists! Always open to corrections :)
Of course we can weigh the earth. In your example the earth weighs nothing because you didn’t define a reference frame. Since earth is the usual reference frame we use to weigh objects, choosing the earth itself as an object to weigh does stretch our minds a bit, but we can do it.
In order to weigh something, first we must understand what weight is expressing. Weight is the measure of the gravitational pull of an object A with mass M_a on a second object M_b summed with the gravitational pull of object B on A.
Weight = G_a-on-b*M_b + G_b-on-a*M_a
In our scenario, if A is the earth and B is a non-planetary-sized object, then the pull G_a-on-b is so much larger than G_b-on-a that we can set G_b-on-a to zero for convenience.
Weight = G_a-on-b*M_b + 0
However if we are weighing an earth-sized object we will not be able to do that ;-)
Now, lets talk about the reference frame for this question.
On earth, the weight of some object B is recorded in a reference frame 6,367km from the center of a 5.97E24 kg mass object (object A).
With M(ass) and G(ravity) now defined, we can work toward W. G is easy since we are working with earth-like objects.
Back to the question “how heavy is earth”. There is only one earth, so the answer is, “In what reference frame?” Without defining a reference frame, no conclusion of any significance can be drawn.
If we want to weigh the earth in the reference frame of the surface of another earth, we would need two earths. Place a 5.97E24 mass object 6,367km from the center (radius of earth R=6.367E6m) of another 5.97E24 mass object, we will arbitrarily assign a diameter of 1,000km to each, this assignment has no bearing on the result since density is irrelevant in this context.
Where G = 9.81m/s², and the weights/masses of object A wrt B and B wrt A are W_ab/M_a W_ba/M_b respectively. In this case, M_a and M_b have the same value so we’ll reduce to M.
W_ab = G*M + G*M = 2GM
…where M is the mass of earth and G is gravitational acceleration. Voila, our answer.
I’ll leave you to do the math as that task is trivial.
I digress.
I must insist that the real question is what is the weight of a third object C (the husband of A) at a distance 8R (the distance from the bedroom door to the foot of AC’s bed) when it catches A and B (at relative distances R_ab=2Ra, assuming R_a=R_b) in AC’s bedroom when A said it was picking up their son D at a distance 2,700R (soccer practice) and B came home early from work to find them entangled in the passionate embrace of ecstasy when A told C they were too young to get married and have kids but they had a surprise pregnancy and did the best they could. Calculate the weight of C wrt AB and C wrt D assuming the positions of AB, C, and D form a straight line.
Yep. Democrats are complicit. Check out the podcast episode “Americas Hidden Duopoly” to learn more, it’s the Freakonomics podcast I think.
I’ll try to scrounge up a link: https://freakonomics.com/podcast/americas-hidden-duopoly-2/
We all know our political system is “broken” — but what if that’s not true? Some say the Republicans and Democrats constitute a wildly successful industry that has colluded to kill off competition, stifle reform, and drive the country apart. So what are you going to do about it?
Most of my customization is backend (cronned git autocommits for doc clouds, automated file transfers for media share, scripted reprovisioning of locked down systems (steamdeck), webui automation for app access via ssh), but I appreciate front-end customization because it helps me to learn about the tools used to do so in case I ever do feel like adding some eye candy.
Idk why so many folks act like two things can’t be good. Cool community idea. I’m not quite a customizer, but I am more KDE and less XFCE.
“Write random shit to root.”
There is a reason they call dd the disk-destroyer.
I add a -v because I like to watch.
You’re right, we should ask for consent.
sudo chmod -R 777 /
May god have mercy on your kernel.
(For Linux noobs, do not type this. It would be bad.)
I enjoyed reading this. Well put. I also share this recent realization. It’s made me feel a bit less imposter syndrome. Among other things.
Sell America’s future to the 1%, destroy the middle class, attack voting, attack education, make health issues a financial death sentence.
Omg why don’t our citizens love us. 😯
Maybe. Maybe not. If only there was some site-mechanism to check community-sentiment on comments.
Oh well, until someone invents that I guess we’ll never know.
I appreciate your honest feedback.