

No
They’re tight, but they don’t push up


No
They’re tight, but they don’t push up
I have so many filters just to block depressing news… Also to block strange hive mind posts about beans etc.
That’s one thing you can do here that you (no longer) can on Reddit
I don’t get what’s wrong… Your past posts also use improper grammar. Are you just stuck up on the slang of your generation?
It’s GenZ slang, originally black vernacular See here: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-ahh
Straight-washing ahh meme


Food crisis 😔


Dyslexic fonts don’t help dyslexia, and the internet’s idea of how dyslexia works is wrong.
https://dyslexiaassociation.org.au/do-dyslexia-fonts-work/
But the new fonts—and the odd assortment of paraphernalia that came before them—assume that dyslexia is a visual problem rooted in imprecise letter recognition. That’s a myth, explains Joanne Pierson, a speech-language pathologist at the University of Michigan. “Contrary to popular belief, the core problem in dyslexia is not reversing letters (although it can be an indicator),” she writes. The difficulty lies in identifying the discrete units of sound that make up words and “matching those individual sounds to the letters and combinations of letters in order to read and spell.” In other words, dyslexia is a language-based processing difference, not a vision problem, despite the popular and enduring misconceptions.
Researchers put the font to the test, comparing it with two other popular fonts designed for legibility—Arial and Times New Roman—and discovered that the purportedly dyslexia-friendly font actually reduced reading speed and accuracy. In addition, none of the students preferred to read material in OpenDyslexic, a surprising rebuke for a font specifically designed for the task.
The idea of making fonts more legible is good, but it doesn’t help dyslexia specifically.
Game Night
Bring your own!
Readers probably assumed they had to bring their own games, from skimming just the big text


expert slop
New word unlocked


“code local and push remote” is only more efficient if you have a faulty connection with ssh or want to use a GUI editor that doesn’t support remote connections. What you’re doing is good. You can scoure for more “modern” ways that might have more glimmer and sparkly lights, but it won’t improve efficiency.


Over 200 Percent In Four Years
Such a strange metric. No graphs either


Skippable headline vs unskippable artwork


We need a way to scan Lemmy posts for reposts from Reddit, to mark and block them all entirely


Nuclear is great for investors, data centers, and the military. The amount of energy it produces allows for more energy intensive operations and research, gives a lot more energy for everyone to play with, but they can also now import nuclear material for “energy” reasons.
Best course of action if you believe these things are good. Bad if you think people should be able to produce their own energy, and don’t need that much energy to prosper.


You get a lot more energy for little resources, ignoring the upfront cost. Also the other comment


You are truly testing the limits of Lemmy with this question
Might I recommend asking one of these communities instead (ignoring the first two pro-China results)?
Please include the word “Trump” in your title so my filter removes it next time, American. Thanks


That’s like saying the GPL goes against FLOSS because it’s a “big spooky license” people have to read before contributing
/g/, because it was one of the only places I could ask tech questions without needing an account