Who decides what is, or receives the label of, misinformation?
Who decides what is, or receives the label of, misinformation?
Thanks for the kind thoughts. <3
I got key-logged by an abusive parent when I was 14. If that doesn’t make you take digital privacy and security seriously, nothing else will.
The English, Scandinavian and European aristocracy?
You know what works every time for me against any telemarketer or tele-scammer?
“Excuse me: are you aware that this is a business line?”
Repeat as necessary with appropriate outrage. They always hang up first.
Have you considered an alternative?
I give them grace. I assess their understanding gently and afford them every opportunity to learn on an accessible level. If they can’t learn from me, then I follow my curiosities and see what I can learn from them.
I remind myself, often, that ‘if I’m in the smartest person in the room, I’m in the wrong room.’
It generally comes down to convenience of access mixed with some ethical consideration for me personally. Out of print books, textbooks, and history or research titles that are in the hundreds I’m simply not going to buy. I use JSTOR where I can, but will get academic research as I need if it’s not readily available. I tend not to pirate indie publishers for any media if I can help it. Sometimes I do to check it out before I purchase it. I try to support creators wherever I can, whenever I can. I like that options are available, and I don’t think anything should truly be off limits.
I have high hopes for Mlem as it’s developed, but Wefwef is a little smoother imo.
Still trying to find a way to view a full list of the communities that exist on different instances (that I am not signed up to) from within any of the current apps. So whichever implements that, if neither has it already, will win with me.
Haven’t logged in since Apollo stopped working. old.reddit + every ad blocked. May they slowly decay, someday existing in archive alone.