If they are aborted they die innocent and go to Heaven.
exactly, if everyone got into heaven then they wouldn’t be so special and get to judge other people
If they are aborted they die innocent and go to Heaven.
exactly, if everyone got into heaven then they wouldn’t be so special and get to judge other people
I bet it’s ‘unsinkable’
I think all that would happen is billionaires would pay people to be their ‘front’ character and somehow find a way to monetize it on the down-low.
Dumb question: what’s a mind map? i’ve heard of it, and seen some examples, but still have no real idea what one is for.
Can’t trust these companies to do what’s right.
This has to be drilled into the collective consciousness as much as possible. There is no such thing as an ethical corporation, or an ethical company that is for-profit – they simply cannot be ethical, they are amoral by design. If Target or Walmart or Netflix do something that is seen as positive, the only reason is a profit motive, not because they are moving towards being ‘good’.
I must be in the minority here, I turned off sub-specific CSS as soon as I could.
you’re trying to censor it because someone doesn’t align with your political views
Then shouldn’t people like 10A be fine with discussion of banning their stuff? That’s literally all ‘anti woke’ bullshit is about, censoring ideas.
It’s not even like the object screams ‘sexual organ’. Boston University archaeologist Curtis Runnels, who was not involved in the recent study, told Science the ornament looks “rather shapeless”, and at first glance, it’s hard to disagree.
really wish they’d said “at first glans”
are you going to be biking in water deeper than 1500 ft?
of course the top reply is some nft bullshit
"might only provide ‘milliseconds’
“Don’t give me your mumbo-jumbo Mister Scientist - will the alarm go off or not?!”
Fry: How many atmospheres can the ship withstand?
Professor: Well, it’s a spaceship, so I’d say anywhere between zero and one.
in fairness, the title said “how”, not why
I mean this completely apolitically - has anyone ever seen Hunter Biden and Jordan Peterson in the same place at the same time?
They don’t actually care about the law. Hunter Biden is only useful to them as something to deflect and waste air complaining about, they don’t actually want anything to happen to him legally and they don’t care about principle.
A more charitable interpretation is that the text that people thought would best train ChatGPT tended to be thoughtful and well-written posts like yours. Maybe you don’t write like ChatGPT, but ChatGPT writes like you.
It’s so delightfully absurd that the conspiracy theory-loving crowd would be so excited about a fucking Kennedy.
As a non-AI Learning Model, I cannot conclude one way or the other with any certainty. What I can say is that ChatGPT responses tend to follow a similar pattern:
Finally, ChatGPT responses tend to end those lists with a summarizing statement that restates the previous ideas - that ChatGPT will often respond in lists, use a formal and logical writing style, and end with a concise summary of the previous statements.
ooh, is there another time? that’s my birthgay