Reading comprehension really is a problem 🫠

I’m not the one complaining, Mr “SKG is trash”. I have a preference, but have no need for changes nor am I saying something’s wrong.

deleted by creator

It unfortunately isn’t. It looks exactly as I would expect.

You prioritise it another way, which is fine. Just don’t make the assumption everybody thinks like you do.

It looks like you’re looking to customise order of search results. That’s a feature you can suggest. I find files first very useful as it what I search for more often than settings, so I would have a different customisation.

Which results “matter”? This isn’t a helpful post. You aren’t describing what existed before, what you expect, what qualifies as good, and what qualifies as bad. You just say “it’s bad”.

If I walked into you house and said “your fridge is worse”, I imagine you would be puzzled too.

I already see this is going to be a fruitless discussion with those proposed discussion points. “His attempt to reduce government spending” 🤣 “attempt”.

No. Libraries will always be useful. Not everyone has the credits to generate the tokens necessary to rewrite every lib in existence.

That it’s owned by … the person who owns it.

I look forward to a response from the EU Commission - if they ever gave a response to the hundreds of comments left with their feedback form. If they just ignore them, it’ll be a sad day for Europe.

This is a good question. It isn’t clear from the job ad.

One, if blender hires somebody from the US.

Will they finally be uploading their talks to peertube? Or will I need to use YouTube again?

How do you mean? You have to apply to get your game there and they reject it if it isn’t popular already?

Honestly, announce it on a gaming community here that allows promotion. And put it on GoG too. Some of use are trying to reduce our use of US tech or reduce use of monopolies.

What do you mean by “diverse competitive market of providers”? All I can imagine is religious schools like Catholic, Presbyterian, Suuni, Shi’ite, Taoist, Satanist, and then language schools, vocational schools, universities, sport schools, etc.

Also what do you mean by a “natural geographic monopoly”? Schools are neither natural, nor geographic, nor monopolies. Take Gemany for example. It has 16 different school systems. France has one school system but schools are given quite some leeway. The Netherlands has an extremely complex system with multiple exits and entries. And as for monopolies, there are often multiple schools in the same city, town, village or neighborhood.

I’m curious to read what you mean by those statements.

Why so many different ways to declare an array-like structure? Tuples, Sets, Dicts, Lists? Dude… ffs, I know each one supposedly has a “different” purpose, I literally don’t see any good benefits on it. It just makes me more confuse.

They are called data structures. Dude, if you can’t tell the difference between them, I question the kind of code you’re writing. Did you learn writing php first?

It sounds like you didn’t study computer science but picked up coding as a side hustle and have yet to understand the absolute basics. Maybe pick up a book or follow a course someday. Things will make more sense then.

IMO, it’s a matter of time. They will learn eventually. We’re just at the beginning and mistakes are being made and will continue to be made. However, I’m much happier with them doing is as FOSS instead of some proprietary, closed source crap that has to be rewritten for millions by some external company a politician happens to know.

Baby steps.

The problem is what they see as inefficiency. Social services, education, and a bunch of other things that are actually beneficial to society they consider a waste of money. There is overlap in what I consider inefficient and waste, but it is small. This does make the cut though.

They rewrote a messenger and the entire office suite. They could’ve collaborated with the Germans in making OpenDesk. Imagine all the dev time going into making Forgejo federated instead of rewriting everything a different way that isn’t interoperable with another government’s tools.

Maybe it has to start with way, every government making their own FOSS tools, features and code getting closer and closer together until they finally merge or dump one FOSS tool over another FOSS tool. 🤷

My thought is: at least its FOSS

Funding has always been a challenge in open source. Projects can be more successful than ever while the people who maintain them can not afford to keep the lights on.

And yet, there are OSI zealots who cannot and will not accept any license that tries to solve the problem of funding. They will quote from the holy pages of OSI as if funding were already a solved problem. It’s like talking to hardcore believers who cannot think that their religious text might not be the answer to everything or *gasp* wrong.