Workers have right; those right are poorly applied but workers have unions to defend themselves. Slaves have none. This is a big difference, and being exploited is enough to be outraged; we do need to make confusion that would invisible people enslaved

The mean-ing of life :

• 1. get fun of your teachers with your fellow
• 2. get fun of your boss with your ,oworkers

A medieval peasant wouldn’t waste so much work for a single meal. S/he would make a broth of it, with vegetables to make it last for days

General and international expropriator patience building exercise

• unionize
• direct action

totally balanced reaction

When workers unions are in arms, they are very effective too

interesting. In some place and time, they won’t. And cops were not allow to vote too.

Always bring water. When tear gaz appears, stop breathing, wet a a piece of cloth and start to breath slowly through it. Even when you are use to it, it’s important to don’t take deep breath.

The advantage over a full mask is that you may not annoy by cops in case of frisking.

You may use waterpool glasses too if you follow the previous instruction

Good luck, and fuck the police

In a lot of countries, you could legally share copyrighted content to your “private and relative” circle. So it’s not actually illegal. Your theory seems correct, even if we do have ftp-siblings too

at some point, this person will do the same for chicken. That will be insane

Like, withe the helicopter headphone system ?

Cool, so could give it to me ?

The bill ask everyone for ID

Mass deportation, massive incarceration, war-crimes, political assassination, harassment of political dissidents, administrative detention. The Zeitgeist

Not every prohibition is bad.

Nobody said such things. I underline how the current state of surveillance has been allowed with this fallacious argument.

Yep. And it will be use for mass repression

Classical bingo to authoritarism

It’s only to protect children It’s only to protect against terrorism It’s only to protect against rapist It’s only to protect against murders It’s only to protect against deterioration oups, it’s everyone except the upper class

This is how personal data bills and fingerprint/adn collect bills have evolved

Now I want to usurp NTP server IP addresses on my local network to send my local printer back in the 70’s. You should have accept B&W printing without those color cartridge, toaster !

GPL impose that derivative work is GPL, not MIT. Indeed, a commercial and a military use could embed work under GPL licence, but I suppose to point ou which part is under GPL. Which is more complicated than MIT, that you could use and label under any licence you want.

I agree that it suppose that those organisations give a shit about law (clearly, they don’t), however a GPL infraction could be used against those organisation, next to other infractions for a trial and type of of actions.

Sorry to exhume this post month later, but it’s actually the most accurate place I’ve found to ask

I recently heard that blur and pixelation are unsafe. I want to evaluate how much it is a threat. I didn’t find any sources, so I tried to reproduce. I took first pictures of a my search engine, blur faces with signal, and try many “unblur” website. IA replace faces with random one each time.

Is there a valid attack that could undo blur with valid method ? Or is it considered unsure because some people blur with unsafe tools ?