This doesn’t advocate for any substantial improvement of data protections. It’s merely a convenience argument to legitimize banning Chinese cars for economic reasons. American car manufacturers will continue to harvest and sell all your data, just with less competition.

Of course, this isn’t a surprise coming from the CFR, the lobbying organization for US imperialism.

Is that the nutty putty guy?

The directors of the matrix are both trans, and confirmed that it was an allegory. Trans people are usually faced with the dilemma of repressing their identity (blue pill) or transitioning (red pill).

“Safe” being defined in a user-hostile manier, i.e. with unmodified Google components and not rooted.

“Google-controlled” would be a better word.

Such is the fate of hypercentralized spaces. The fediverse fixes this.

Women can choose to wear a hijab, just like women can choose to be a stay at home parent, out of their free will. But pressuring them one way or the other is cringe.

>Open post criticizing the US

>Look inside

>Whataboutism

Every time

Leftists fighting leftists would be pretty on brand, but in that case they’d both call each other fascists. So you’re probably right.

I don’t see how this is so difficult. Given the choice between a narcissistic billionaire or an independent, accountable government commission that’s bound by the rule of law, I’ll choose the latter every time.

Or the unsafest place, if you’re not privileged.

I don’t have an opinion on the matter being discussed

You know it’s an option to just… keep scrolling right? This isn’t high school, you aren’t obliged to leave a comment.

Obviously acquiring publicly available data is legal

Under the EU GDPR it is often not legal. Controllers need a legal basis, which only exists if there is an appropriate relationship between the controller and the data subject.

Are you saying granite? It’s granted, with a D. Take things for granted. Did you actually think it was… Jesus Christ Rick, what are you a boulder, a rock person? How long have you been saying that wrong?

What, you can erase my memories?

👏More👏Queer👏War👏Criminals👏

Am I missing the joke, or is this glorifying war and NATO?

Digitizing is only lossy once*. Analog is lossy every time you copy it and degrades over time.

*Assuming you use a lossless digital format

No, you got downvoted because you were insulting and incorrect.

Did you read the entire comment?

If you forget all the death and destruction caused by this war, then yes. I’m sure it’s very profitable.

Expressing an opinion while queer = virtue signalling?