Go has an idiom like so https://github.com/hashicorp/vault/blob/8da4386caceb3fdfaa90074bb29c77e8a99c7dad/api/kv_test.go#L27, when i mention name i’m referring to that string.

I get what your saying, we’ve all worked in terrible code bases, i’ve also worked in code bases where this kind of article was enforced. What you wound up with was something that was very wordy.

Almost always use parameterized style tests, always have a name field, I don’t use full sentences tho, that seems like too much. Don’t believe I’ve ever seen a test like that either

These toy examples feel like strawmen to me

For this kind of thing i usually go by popularity (active repo/popular repo), mostly to have the most other people in your boat. It doesn’t always work but generally if other users have to migrate at least you can ask them questions.

On the face of it i’d go with the csi driver version, only because we use alternative csi drivers ourselves, and haven’t seen any issues (ours are pretty aws vanella though).

We use storage classes (for our drivers) the “dynamic provisioning” section of https://juicefs.com/docs/csi/guide/pv, you’ll need to make one of those, then create a statefulset and mount the pv in there.

I do find statefulsets to be a bit of a not as well supported part of kubernetes, but generally they work well enough.

I guess i shouldn’t have answered, I do have experience with multiple storage-classes, but none of the classes you mention (so like i don’t really know anything about them). I envisioned you dealing with pod level storage issues and thought that’d be something most programs would have lots of difficulty dealing with, where as a more service oriented approach would expect remote failures (hence the recommendation).

All of the things you mentioned don’t seem like they have provisioners, so maybe you mean your individual nodes would have these associated remote fs’. At that point i don’t think kubelet cares, you just mount those on the machines and tell kubelet about it via host mount

Oh shit look there’s a CSI driver for juicefs https://juicefs.com/docs/csi/introduction/, they kinda start out recommending the host mount https://juicefs.com/docs/cloud/use_juicefs_in_kubernetes/.

We make some use of PV’s but people i find my team often tend to avoid them.

I probably should have shut my mouth from the start!

My gut says go multi cluster (or not) at that pointbut treat the remote as a service, have a local container be a proxy

Decide your budget first, everything after that follows. Most likely like others have said ignore that old pc, you get get something much better second hand for very cheap.

lol, way better!

Hate this title, how about:

“A novel by author Lena McDonald, accidentally leaves AI prompt in published version.”

assuming i learned, lol :D

Ugh, i thought this was a question, not a link. So i spent time googling for a good tutorial on floats (because I didn’t click the link)…

Now i hate myself, and this post.

I don’t actually play GTA online, but they are very successful with their online offering, their daily low looks to be >60k concurrent players. I suspect it’d be VERY hard not to continue with the online bit.

Interviewer: why are you a good fit for valve?

Hoopo: we sold ror before we could make a third

interviewer: welcome aboard!

ECC encryption seems semi preferred now a days i thought

If the internal sponsor of an idea get bored or loses support from colleagues, the project just halts.

Yeah, i kind of agree with everything you’ve said, and history as i remember it kind of backs up what you’ve said about tf2.

But I don’t agree that they don’t care about story and only do it for marketing. I think halflife’s episodes are all about an attempt at continuing that story.

I think that the Cave and Glados bits of portal are a large part of what made those games (of course the gameplay loops are really tight there.

I think the only way to know would to be an insider. I also don’t think it really matters, the games they make are good.

I do think you are right, they start out on gameplay; getting that inner game loop to be fun is primary (I kind of though that’s how most (non narrative) game studios worked though).

they don’t make games to tell stories

This was mostly what i was suggesting was incorrect. I also don’t think it’s a major part of marketing. I’m suggesting they don’t bother putting the work of story into something until that inner game loop is fun.

TF2 was the result of experimentation with team based death match gameplay

Didn’t they already know about team fortress? This seems off based on team fortress having already existed, same with wolfenstine enemy territory.

I’m not sure your theory stands up, they did all those comics around TF2. They hired those old man Murray dudes I thought just to work on narrative. They’ve gotten famous actors to do roles!

I think saying halflife was never about story is just wrong.

If you stripped dialog from portal you’d have a significantly worse game. Did you forget all the glados shit that came out after portal? Humor is a major part of those games which is all about dialog.

I’ve got seinheisser 598 that are quite good, but I understood seinheisser to have been bought and maybe quality went down. I also have byerdynamic 990s that I find uncomfortable for longer periods.

I also have hifiman sundara that are (except for the cable) far and above the best headphones I’ve ever had both in comfort and sound.

There’s a person on the bapcsales Canada reddit called lifelongcaboose who seems to really know their headphones that recommended them

Point of a corporation is to make money. Point of a “limited liability company” is to prevent losses on the company side from financially damaging the owners. LLC’s do not (and should not) protect owners from criminal acts.

This shit happens all the time. Look at car settlements, it starts at the top. I’m not against a whistle blower framework at all, but it seems like executives get all the pay and none of the culpability (see headline).

Executives, focus on executives.