gian

Correction: Google backs everyone who let them to do what they want, they don’t really care if they are fascist or pedos as long as they don’t interfere with their money making machine

Yeah, me too. But home automation has its usercase: just think about an holiday home where you want to turn on the heating and the boiler the day before you arrive.
Sure, you can ask a local friend to do it for you but being able to do it remotely is nice.

More than that, it is the need to continually sell appliances. If you care to build to last (and we still know how to do it) then in the next quarter you sells will go down, the profit will go down and the board will go down.

I would say that it is more like a software company putting in their TOS that you cannot use their software to do a specific thing(s).
Would be correct to sue the software company because a user violated the TOS ?

I agree that what happened is tragic and that the answer by OpenAI is beyond stupid but in the end they are suing the owner of a technology for a uses misuse of said technology. Or should we sue also Wikipedia because someone looked up how to hang himself ?

That’s like a gun company claiming using their weapons for robbery is a violation of terms of service.

The gun company can rightfully say that what you do with your property is not their problem.

But let’s make a less controversial example: do you think you can sue a fishing rods company because I use one of their rods to whip you ?

Tonight alone, I created dozens of JSON files using an LLM for a game mod I’m developing that would have taken me days if I had created them manually.

You don’t need AI to do this, just a few dozen lines of Python…

In Dell machine from that time (like the XPS 9550) is pretty easy to upgrade the Ram, the storage or replace the battery. On some models you can sacrifice battery life (using a smaller one) for a second ssd.
On some model also the keyboard is pretty easy to replace.

If (and is a really, really big if) this open the door to a better understanding of this type of pathologies and a way to somewhat cure them, I would say that it would be for the better.

But of course I am sure it will not end this way…

No, no updates needed unless I encounter a bug or they add a new feature I really want.

Fine, but maybe the update fix a bug that hit other users and that still not have hit you, be it for sheer luck or any other reason.

I would be terrified of using a bluetooth mesh network in a situation where private, encrypted communications are illegal. That would be literally walking around transmitting your intent. It’s a great idea in a free country though.

You have a point but that would means that the only other solution is to fall back to personal comunications, every electronic channel is unusable in such situation.

In a dystopia, you want to blend in.

Or you can simply have so much irrelevant data that the few important bits are lost in a sea of randomness if you don’t know where to look.

Something like deltachat has the right idea there - you have to look like boring email on the network. Maybe even layer on stenography -sending boring emails with cat pictures, but your messages are hidden inside them.

The main point of using bluetooth is to not rely on a centralized server that can be compromised and/or shut down.
If you still use email as transportation layer you could just write an app that really has e2ee, plausible deniability or any other feature you want since in the end you are relying on the same centralized infrastructure.

Honestly, I would probably go with sneakernet. A microsd card can be hidden very easily, are difficult to detect electronically, transport virtually unlimited text, and be encrypted in-case the mule gets caught to prevent networks being exposed. The latency is just a necessary evil.

The latency is not the problem, it is already known that to move large quantities of data the fastest method is to send an hard drive (or whatever else).
The real problem here is where the mule can go.

Which would not be that much of a problem if not for the first 2 weeks, until someone put out a GUI to do it, with integration with app stores to download automatically the app…

oh wait…

Switch to mesh networks could be an idea. It is not that difficult to send messages with bluetooth, problem is adoption: a system like that works only if there are many people using it.

Last time did not end well for about 6 million people…

Obviously not the personal password, but sometimes you need to share a password. Think about the password for a remote desktop your team may need to connect to for troubleshooting a problem for example.

If someone can gain physical access to your PC you are done anyway, he van simply copy the file or do whatwver he want

Do you really think that they can pay 5 trillion dollars, or even the 20% of this, to the the shareholders ?

Let’s hope that this process will continue even after Trump

Make the companies pay dearly for this

No, not the company, this would only put in in danger the employees (guess who would be fired in case of downsizing).
You need to dearly punish who signed the contract.

Partially, if OpenAI lose 11.5 billion, someone get 11.5 billion, the money is used to pay something it did not vanish in a cloud

I wonder how long it will be before investments start getting pulled back because of a lack of ROI.

Just wait for the next hot thing to come out

“We’ll give you some money if you promise to keep the blacks out of your organisation”

I suppose that this would be against the other part, the one relative to the federal anti-discrimination laws.