Yea that’s not explained better than a math teach. They just swapped notation common in math, for notation common in one specific programming language. it’s only easier for the audience who happens to be familiar with programming in general, and that language in particular.

that, or just use the mobile page which is designed for such narrow aspects.

no it isn’t. My interest in Lemmy is not romantic and if you do agree with this, get out and engage people in person more often.

no.

no love for the Relay expats?

hard disagree. This isn’t black and white, you can do some of both and that is not wrong or unprincipled. Thinking otherwise is just simple minded.

See here’s the thing - if you are worried about protesting reddit, that inherently means you’re hoping to interact with it. As far as I’m concerned, just don’t care. Yes I disagree with what reddit is doing. Does that mean I shouldn’t give it any visits or make any posts? well, depends on what I want to do. For example, just now I used it to spread info about some of this to fellow mods and within our local community. I believe it was worth doing. I don’t believe it was less positive than just being overly simple minded and saying “I don’t like what reddit is doing, therefore it’s bad if i use reddit.”

any mods that rolled over to continue doing an unpaid job just to retain some form of power are bitches.

Personally, I don’t believe that POV is fair. As someone who, with a small group of friends, started a sub that has grown to 100k people and is the most active internet community for a niche gaming segment - i personally think it’s not that easy to judge. I have not been active on my sub in years, and I leave the job up to the new guard, but I can completely respect the decision to want to keep something you invested in building alive and a positive influence in the area it affects. It’s easy to armchair QB stuff like this and judge others decisions, but to just generalize and say “better to die than to think something else is better in the bigger picture” is a bit of a cop out imo.

I think what you’re describing is different. It lists only the communities the current instance knows about, it does not list all communities on all instances, and it doesn’t even list the subset of all communities on known instances.

Nah, the file would be small and only instances would need to keep a record of it. It’s no different from the community list already maintained by instances, just would be extended to cover all participating instances. even if there were 1 million rows to the table, that’s a very tiny dataset.

I’d think the cost to storage and performance would be trivially small, not even a rounding error relative to the over server/host loads associated with an instance.

I posted this in Ask Lemmy but since it didn’t get traction I’m gonna piggyback on the visibility of this thread:

As i learn my way around ActivityPub based services, what stands out to me the most is federation is very much exposed to the users. (That, or I still just haven’t wrapped my head around the architecture details and how they manifest in terms of user experience.)

Am I just misunderstanding this, or would the end-user experience be more fluid and functional if the federation mechanics were mostly ‘under the hood’. What I mean by that is - right now if there’s a community I would enjoy participating in that is located on a different instance, in order to do that I need to (a) know it exists in the first place, (b) know what instance it is on, and (c) explicitly tell my instance about its address in order to join.

Would it be possible to have some form of master index (replicated across instances - not a centralized service) along with a public standard for registering an instance/community on the index? And if something like that existed, couldn’t that push what is an inherently more technical detail to lower levels of the implementation, and make for a simpler UX by allowing every instance to expose a more complete list of communities to users from directly within whatever instance they choose to use?

And what is it with the narrow aspects? I totally get the need for mobile support, but the default desktop view looks like it’s trying to play nice with old 4:3 aspects. If that’s the root design goal, I sure hope we can let that design goal die. In a 16:9 maximized window there is so much wasted real estate it pains me.

18pp isn’t a small margin. 49 vs 51 is a small margin. 41 vs 59 is no contest.

The difference is you cited software projects, not hosted infrastructure. A person can contribute to a FOSS dev project and not incur expenses dependent on end-users activity. Hosting a fediverse application isn’t like that, somebody has to pay for the hosting and the hosting expenses will scale with user activity.

“Created for Lemmy” isn’t really a thing, all you need is to implement the ActivityPub protocol. Whether or not it has any relationship to Lemmy has no bearing on if it can talk to instances using Lemmy’s implementation.

Sure but anyone can implement something using the activityPub spec and federate with other instances regardless of what flavor they’re using.

from what i understand, this is syntax implemented on lemmy. it’s not from the deeper ActivtyPub protocol all of these things are implementing. If that’s true, it won’t render on kbin how it does on lemmy.

not sure that solution is a good one for this environment. I’m new but from what i’ve seen the concept of moderation is different and your solution is trying to engineer a reddit-like moderation design to an architecture that is fundamentally not reddit-like. Moderation here is at the instance level, not the community level.

there are are lot of idiots, a lot. I don’t know how to fix that, so I just ignore them and move on.