It’s how dishwashers work: more cycles = more rinsing, then later rinse it all off.

You could do a quick pre-wash, then a long cycling of water, and lastly a rinse with clean water.

Btw

So this is how the furry subculture started

That cis women playing against trans women is unfair. As said above, the actual data proves that this is not the case. Of course it’s undeniably true that reactionary dudes (and maybe even women) feel like things are unfair, but the actual facts invalidate that feeling.

The discretized, simplified middle school biology you’re invoking here is simply not a precise enough model to depict reality.

Trans women aren’t “male” from a muscle development perspective, as they don’t have a male hormone profile lol.

Nah, that’s simply not true if you look at the actual data about how well trans athletes perform.

I usually write “POSIXy shell” but I thought that was clear from context this time.

The problem is that exit statuses !=0 aren’t treated as error by default (with a way to turn that off for individual expressions). Instead you have to set multiple settings and avoid certain constructs in bash/ZSH/…

Everything that works like a modern programming language by default is fine of course

Yeah, and that’s just one of many many things to consider.

As a long time former ZSH user, I’ll definitely include ZSH in shell languages to avoid for scripting.

The problem is simply the number of rules and incantations to slavishly include everywhere to make your script bail on error. set -e is not enough by far.

Python with plumbum or nushell are definitely better.

Oh you sweet summer child.

If you don’t use pipes or command substitutions, set -e gets you a fair part of the way there.

If you’re interested, I can look up the rest of the arcane incantations necessary.

Shell scripts were a mistake. The weirdness you have to remember to safely stop executing when something fails is mind-boggling.

I’m so glad nushell exists and doesn’t need any configuring to just do the reasonable thing and stop executing when something fails.

Hiii

Why?

Nuance? On my internet?

OK Google set a reminder 10 years from now to remind that gal/guy of ralph

I agree with you here. As soon as you change something, that should be respected but as long as you use the default theme/wallpaper/… that could just as well mean that you prefer tracking the default or don’t care at all.

Now bringing back the explicitly disabled search bar really is atrocious

No, but one for systemd

I’m not the same person, I just saw someone responding to kindness with discouragement, and humanity really doesn’t need that right now.

WTF is wrong with you. A stranger pours out their heart for you and you just stomp on it? Have the decency to just shut up and ignore it instead of going out of your way to be an asshole.

So you’re agreeing. “one does not simply stop, because one needs to be really sure that they want to stop for some reason or another”. The desire to stop doesn’t come from nothing, yet it’s the vital ingredient for stopping successfully. Unless you have it, stopping is really hard.

The contents of your message aren’t a “no”, they’re a “yes, and”

What was the problem? I can see that if you don’t get past one of the steps described in the wiki, then you’re blocked. But I think if one has some experience with shell, CLIs and TUIs, it should be possible to follow the steps until you have a bootable system.

Is it worth it to try that, maybe through multiple attempts? Idk.