This meme is a bit dishonest because its about Chinese government harvesting this data not about companies harvesting it. Both are bad but ones substantially worse.
This meme is a bit dishonest because its about Chinese government harvesting this data not about companies harvesting it. Both are bad but ones substantially worse.
lol fixed- thank you. I think you are on to something there - I don’t necessarily think he is a bad MENTOR but I don’t think he’s taught programming before so he doesn’t have a formal system for teaching us. I am wondering if there might be a way I can try to work with him to try to make what we are learning/teaching easier to digest for myself cause i am certain it would benefit the other devs.
Honestly, appreciate you all confirming this. Makes me feel less crazy or less of the problem. I was at the point that I felt like I needed to go get tested for ADHD cause of my inability to focus on these presentations at times.
Thank you for responding. I think you may be on to something in that sense regarding the new developers. I think they are still so new in software dev that they probably aren’t even sure what is the most effective for them but the reason why I say they are probably learning better than I am is due to the fact that they worked (watched) him design and create business rules DLLs and standards which we didn’t have when I first created my first program (I started about 2 years before others, while the team was still brand new and we couldn’t get devs from outside to stay longer than a year).
Thank you - I appreciate the response. That is what I do but I felt like I wasn’t being very helpful in both situations because I was attempting to multitask and I am honestly terrible at it. Recently, I’ve tried to try my best to focus on the content, thinking I was struggling due to multi-tasking but I think it’s just the way he’s teaching. He is an amazing supervisor/boss so I know I can talk to him but I feel like I need to come to him with concrete suggestions before doing so. I don’t like raising problems without solutions personally. I do appreciate the thought though, maybe that is what I should revert to doing.
I trust them more than “alt” historians who use flimsy evidence.
I’m not sure I’d trust non historians about history.
Well you took the cowards way out. I was hoping you’d actually try to contend with any of the many points they made as it would be an interesting conversation but you had to lean on ad homs in the end.
Okay so what I’m hearing is you want companies to make investments in artists directly - so a form of profit sharing essentially. Why would a company invest in artists if artists get all of the profits when its successful and the company loses all of the capital if it fails? Why would any business want to partake in a system like that?
Okay, but what does a system look like that moves past both? How do you ensure people get resources if you don’t want capitalism or a planned economy?
I agree broadly with much of your assessment of history and many of the problems that bely current western society. The rich might be exploiting capitalism to their benefit but a capitalist system with proper regulation will always be better (in terms of Quality of life and freedom) for larger groups of people Than a planned economy.
People need to expect to pay for art and entertainment. People should. It’s immoral and unethical to not pay for art and expect art to be there.
Lol. The people selling it to their local communities are just as bad as the people at the top. The people at the top are many times from the local communities you guys are defending.
I think this has more to do with it than the FBI personally.
I dislike how this narrative completely bypasses the power hungry, money hungey gangsters who were perfectly fine making money off the backs of their communities.
Who determines its unnecessary? The market? Government groups?
We’re still a far way away from the level of automation necessary to make working only 2 days a week feasible imo
Why would a business pay for these things that make their workers more efficient and then relinquish all of the profit that came from making things more efficient?
Do you think the majority of US citizens want higher taxes? There’s alot of de-programming that has to be done. Democrats, who are generally better than Republicans when it comes to this stuff (due to the low bar they’ve erected) aren’t necessarily full on board with tax increases.
I guess your world is only black and white ay?