Soo, basically sandboxie?

At least it’s not like a bunch of other popular libraries:

Then I get help from the community for a couple of years and a bunch of contributes to my bridge. Then my bridge is so nice that I can add a toll booth on both sides of the bridge and start charging people money to get across

Maybe you’re confused with Truecrypt?

Truecrypt died and Veracrypt came as a port. Haven’t heard of Veracrypt being dead

I guess it’s cool - you can port some stuff from Postgres like pgVector and make Mysql a vector database.

On the other hand, I’m also think ‘why?’. At some point just use Postgres instead of overcomplicating Mysql with extensions

However, what is stopping a malicious actor from bypassing the API gateway and communicating directly to the micro services ? Do we solve this problem using a firewall, so only trusted traffic reaches the micro services ?

Kind of - sort of

With this kind of setup, usually you’d put all your micro services inside a VPC. The micro services wouldn’t even be directly accessible from the internet. So it wouldn’t really be a “firewall” - but a nat gateway.

Though conceptually a little bit the same. The API gateway is kind of acting as a firewall

To be fair, it’s not that crazy - your agents are generating a lot of data that Azure DevOps is storing. And they’re doing a bunch of other things like release management and showing test results over time, etc etc

I’m using Azure DevOps practically free - (unless I build way too much and run out of free credits for the month)

But since so many things in Azure DevOps are already free… If you’re going to start substituting the paid features like extra build agents with your own “free self hosted agents” then where are they getting any money from?

Probably not “coolest” as in ‘best code ever’ or most complex code ever - but that got most coverage. So I think it’s pretty cool

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifJnWVSoyAY

Pretty cool. I tried to google it, and I couldn’t actually find the source for it. Just a bunch of articles about it and a reddit thread.

I’m curious what it’s written in

If it’s “open source hardware” wouldn’t it be pretty easy to put it different screens?

Like it also only had a 2 GB SD card… I’d guess most people would upgrade that

Are there existing tools you love (or hate) that do something similar?

This sounds similar to “Static code analysis” tools. Especially now that these code analysis tools are getting AI integrations.

For example we use coderabbit.ai. That does a code review on PRs in github, and reviews these sort of things. Especially the simpler things that you’ve mentioned like poor naming conventions, violations of language-specific best practices, and readability issues. I’m not sure if it will automatically come up with “large refactoring opportunities” by default - but maybe you can custom-prompt configure it to try, I guess

(Comment) Why have a separate webpage if such of helper can be built into IDE/editor?

Coderabbit also has IDE extensions: https://www.coderabbit.ai/ide - I think the separate webpage exists for org level configurations and overviews. These “best practices” are probably defined on a team level to ensure everyone uses the same code-style and things like that

I’m not sure if “just a website to copypaste code and get reviews” is really a good idea. Maybe for juniors that want to review one class or method or something. But usually code is spread across multiple files, and structural refactor opportunities are on a larger scale then just a couple files

On September 19, Ruby Central, a nonprofit organization that manages RubyGems.org, a platform for sharing Ruby code and libraries, asserted control over several GitHub repositories for Ruby Gems as well as other critical Ruby open source projects that the rest of the Ruby development community relies on.

Uhm, so how does this happen? If some people create Ruby Gems and host them under their own github account, how would Ruby Central suddenly assert control over them?

Since you’re getting downvoted, maybe you want to explain why using Github free is “pointing a loaded gun at your foot”?

I’m using github for a bunch of my public repos as a free backup service… Why would I want to use a self hosted or way more obscure git forge? Seems riskier than just dumping it on github

Probably the best thing Ubisoft released since assassin’s creed black flag

Snowe is sysadmin of programming.dev…

So source: Snowe

Many people believe that the ToS was added to make Mozilla legally able to train AIs on the collected data.

“Don’t attribute to malice what is easily explained by incompetence”

So yea Mozilla wrote some terms that where ambiguous and could be interpreted in different ways, and ‘many people believed’ that they did this intentionally and had the worst intentions possible by their interpretation of the new ToS

Then Mozilla rewrote that ToS after seeing how people were interpreting the original ToS:
https://www.theverge.com/news/622080/mozilla-revising-firefox-terms-of-use-data

And yea, now ‘many people will believe’ that ‘Mozilla revised their decision to do this after the backslash’ - OR, it was never their intention and now phrased it better after the confusion

People just want to get their pitchforks out and start drama at any possible opportunity without evidence of wrongdoing… Mozilla added stupid stuff to the ToS, ok yea fair enough - but if they actually did “steal user data” - this would be very easily detectable with Wireshark or something

Programming.dev is hosting Iceshrimp: https://bytes.programming.dev/

You could host your own instance, or if your opinion-pieces are programming related, post them there

It’s called embeddings in other models as well:
https://huggingface.co/blog/getting-started-with-embeddings
https://ollama.com/blog/embedding-models

Also some feedback, a bit more technical, since I was trying to see how it works, more of a suggestion I suppose

It looks like you’re looping through the documents and asking it for known tags, right? ({str(db.current_library.tags)}.)

I don’t know if I would do this through a chat completion and a chat response, there are special functions for keyword-like searching, like embeddings. It’s a lot faster, and also probably way cheaper, since you’re paying barely anything for embeddings compared to chat tokens

So the common way to do something like this in AI would be to use Vectors and embeddings: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/embeddings

So - you’d ask for an embedding (A vector) for all your tags first. Then you ask for embeddings of your document.

Then you can do a Nearest Neighbor Search for the tags, and see how closely they match

Recruitment is now basically Dead Internet theory…

It gives an example:

For example, with the phrase “My favorite tropical fruits are __.” The LLM might start completing the sentence with the tokens “mango,” “lychee,” “papaya,” or “durian,” and each token is given a probability score. When there’s a range of different tokens to choose from, SynthID can adjust the probability score of each predicted token, in cases where it won’t compromise the quality, accuracy and creativity of the output.

So I suppose with a larger text, if all lists of things are “LLM Sorted”, it’s an indicator.

That’s probably not the only thing, if it can detect a bunch of these indicators, there’s a higher likelihood it’s LLM text