He took control of the purse from congress, he’s attempting to pass laws in the guise of executive orders, he’s shuttering departments and reallocating their resources to other parts of the executive branch, he’s been talking about creating an executive branch police type force… And that’s just the first question you had.

He’s regulating industries through tariffs (which are also a duty of congress and not the president so back to centralizing power for a two-fer)

He’s sending in the military to predominantly liberal/democratic run cities to back up ICE who is under orders from his goon Miller to harass anyone with a non white skin tone.

All easily seen examples if you paid any attention to media coverage, and extremely easy if you’re on the news subs on here…

Anyhow, now that that’s cleared up, kindly quit your bullshit.

Pretty sure we saw that with Luigi too

I haven’t seen any of them praising the assassination of Palestinians though.

Where are these liberals? I’m only seeing celebrations or “I don’t condone but in this case I don’t care either” for the fascist getting shot.

Or were you hearing them condemn gun violence for the school shooting that also occurred today?

Both the schools I went to and the schools I have taught at had landlines in the classroom, as well as some in the lounge and the main offices. They were all real big on parent teacher communication so that might have been a reason why.

BUT WHAT ABOUT THE NUT OILS?

Seriously though, interesting discovery

Oh me too, they just seem to have very few long term planning leaders these days.

True, but remember they will just blame it on the previous administration until it’s forgotten.

Why would they do that when they could use the time-honored GOP strategy of blaming it on democrat leadership and immigrants?

Is it apple only? Would love it on my droid if it’s available.

Gah, what a great movie for a myriad of great actors. Prequels to Wash (Tudyk), King Baratheon (Addy), and Vision (Bettany)

I think you mean Sir Ulrich von Lichtenstein

I like any sort of rpg that requires you to understand the text so you know what you need doing. Diablo 2 was my way to learning another language, but it’s fairly old now. Maybe something along those lines or that has a good crafting system? I would suggest stuff like Grounded, some of the Elder Scrolls (oblivion just got a remake so that might be nice), project zomboid, etc.

It does get a lot more information and nuance though. Last week tonight only runs once a week. I don’t know that Last Week Tonight cites all of their sources for each episode like Some More News does.

I think of Vanessa playing the piano.

How much can it drop before banks come collecting on his loans?

Definitely proof of Bacchus.

Articulate the difference. You keep saying I’m missing the point or that there is a difference but you don’t state what it is.

You’re reading into it too much. I read your response to the other guy and went to the first example my mind thought of for government regulation of foodstuffs that are safe to consume but otherwise banned for a reason.

I for one would eat endangered species if it’s all I had access to, but I understand the damage it would cause and am comfortable eating other sources of food. I also do love eating beef and pork and chicken, but I’m willing to reduce consumption of those for other sources if needed.

We see a ton of rainforest being chopped to expand access to cattle farming, tons of pollution runoff from farms, and a history of antibiotic resistance being transferred due to heavy antibiotic use in close quarter factory farms. I would argue those would be equally damaging to not just us, but also many ecosystems and the species in them.

So I draw an equivalence there. If you’re not cool with eating endangered species, maybe you can ease off the gas on mammal based protein.

On the other hand, it’s looking like we might be able to get around a lot of that damage with lab grown meat.

Would you eat lab grown meat if standard beef/poultry/pork were to be banned?

The point being? That it’s fine to set government regulation to protect species from being wiped out and that somehow doesn’t transfer to it being fine to regulate beef or other meats as we see them negatively affecting a vast swath of ecosystems including many of those endangered species? The harm has to be to the species being regulated and not from the species?

Are endangered species not also safe to eat generally?