• 0 Posts
  • 92 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 24th, 2023

help-circle


  • More vulnerable, probably yes. Phones are very locked down and secured (unless you root or install custom firmware).

    But, they are still worse for privacy due to how they’re used. The phone (and thus Google and Apple and Facebook and others) has access to your location all the time - your computer doesn’t. The computer is only vulnerable when on - the phone is always on.

    The threats are different and from different sources. Random hackers mining shitcoins on your computer, big companies knowing what you’re doing when you carry your phone.





  • I’ve gone through many pairs of headphones too, I’ve worked from home for years and had a long-distance relationship in a time before smartphones (and before cheap wireless headphones) so Skype+headphones was the solution. Both driving over them with an office chair and accidentally pulling them were real dangers and caused real damage.

    Now I just don’t use them anymore, since I have meetings on a company laptop, and the relationship is much closer.



  • The battery will fail to hold charge and they will become useless. Not the truth for wired headphones.

    I don’t know how you use your headphones, but in my case I switched to wireless because every single pair of wired headphones I had would break. Usually the cable, earbuds because they were in my pocket, and the overhead ones I’d drive over with my office chair.

    Switched to wireless a couple years ago, no issues since then.












  • There’s a great test for programmers called FizzBuzz. It’s an extremely easy task - print some numbers (maybe 1 to 100), but replace them with Fizz if they’re divisible by 3, by Buzz if they’re divisible by 5, or by FizzBuzz if they’re both.

    Many reasonable people consider it way too easy - if you can write this, it doesn’t mean that you can write complex programs, or that you know the applicable languages, or that you know anything about the business domain.

    But interviewers know that it’s a great test because a lot of so-called programmers still fail it.