again, this why i claim that lemmy is not the solution to the problem we are trying to solve.
again, this why i claim that lemmy is not the solution to the problem we are trying to solve.
Wish we had the option to add it to the bottom
@apple @android feature request here. submitting ticket.
you should be able to install a custom ROM that allows you to have notification bar on bottom so that you can swipe up.
sorry man i guess people will just never learn how the voting system works (i upvoted you). i obviously understand some people like big phones, phablets, if you will. and that’s fine. i still use my phablet for media and stuff.
but the big phone manufacturers don’t realize there’s a market for this and they completely neglect that. or rather, they know that there’s a market for it but they know it won’t make them enough profit so they stick with the mainstream, which is a huge shame. i’m sure that there are engineers working at google, samsung, etc. who would love to work on smaller phones, phones with other unique hardware such as trackballs, but aren’t able to because of “turn everything into money” mindset.
aahh, now that would be interesting. i’ve always liked that all the letters of hex happen to be on lefthand side of keyboard anyway. instead of adding new keys i think i’d rather have A-F be shift of 0-5
fair point. recall that this is the first draft. i’ll post the second draft today.
agreed. i kind of neglected those characters initially but will add them now
sort of rock your hand as you instantiate an array
now that’s a good idea
here’s the markup:
[{a:7},"`\n~",{a:4},"(\n",")","\\\n|"],
[{a:7},",",{a:4},"[\n{","]\n}","="],
["Num Lock","/","*","-",{x:0.25,f:4,w:14,h:5,d:true},""],
[{f:3},"7\nHome","8\n↑","9\nPgUp",{h:2},"+"],
["4\n←","5","6\n→"],
["1\nEnd","2\n↓","3\nPgDn",{h:2},"Enter"],
["0\nIns",",",".\nDel"],
[{w:2},"Space", ";\n:"]
they did it out of spite, to get you to stop ordering groceries from the internet, lol
a lot of work for fairly little benefit on the back-end
i think enough people want the feature that the benefit would be worth it
limiting it to communities with the exact same name
you actually wouldn’t have to limit it to exact same name if you’re making a front-end thing, if you allow for the user to configure their “merged communities”
correct. so let’s have a way to “connect” communities, a way for any 2 communities on 2 different instances (or the same instance) to “merge” their content, even if they have different names (e.g. “games” “gaming”). now maybe this could be user-defined, a per client thing, like multireddits, but with a recommendation on each community page that shows the most frequent “client community-merge-configurations”
communities across instances could essentially link their feeds
yes, that’s pretty much what i’m saying. in the background, that is what would be happening, but on the frontend, the user just sees “communityname” and a bunch of posts that are pulled from all instances that have a community matching that name.
to clarify, “admin of an instance” is different from “moderator of a community”.
good point with being able to switch to another if a mod goes haywire. but i think that there just shouldn’t be any mods – or rather, the community members should moderate themselves via some algorithm that uses votes, discussion, etc. to hide/remove posts. you could choose to view a hidden post that has been downvoted a lot if you want.
27yo tech enthusiast and worker and linux user here
unihertz jelly 2. unihertz also some other small phones. also has a headphone jack, fm radio, wrist strap, customizable LED, programmable hardware button.
this is so fucking stupid though. almost everyone reads books and/or watches movies, and their speech is developed from that. the way we speak is modeled after characters and dialogue in books. the way we think is often from books. do we track down what percentage of each sentence comes from what book every time we think or talk?