This is pretty cool and definitely has use, but IIUC this is strictly a free forwarding address, right? I don’t think it tries to compete with Proton Mail or Tuta Mail.

Thank you for raising this point.

Are there even other privacy-respecting email providers that are fit for the job? I’m genuinely curious.

Could you elaborate on the reform?

For some reason, I was under the impression that laptops in the MNT Reform series were the only laptops that were manufactured using open (source) hardware only. Or, if there were others, that it must have been doing something so special that they deserved to be put on a pedestal. But, currently, I don’t feel confident enough to state why it would be superior over say the Olimex TERES-I or Pinebook Pro.

I hear the hype yet to me it looks like a severely overpriced tv box with some low-grade peripherials strapped to it in the least space efficient way possible.

We definitely pay a premium, but I don’t know exactly why. Especially when the aforementioned Olimex TERES-I and Pinebook Pro are almost an order of magnitude cheaper.

Did they got rockchip to release sources instead of blobs or something?

From what I understood, Rockchip offers (at least some of) its SoCs as open source hardware. So, what MNT Reform did for the SoC is order them as open source hardware and include/publicize/provide all the schematics (etc).

What is the praise actually for?

FWIW, the open source hardware aspect is what I was intrigued by*.

I got a couple I really like, though for vastly different reasons:

• The MNT Reform series takes the crown for their commitment towards open source software AND open source hardware.
• The ASUS Zenbook DUO is an early entry in the direction of what I perceive as peak design. This technology will only improve from here and I hope other vendors will take cues from this one.

Curiously, the cream of the crop in terms of security-focused Linux (i.e. Kicksecure and secureblue) leverage systemd to their benefit.

Obligatory insert Manjarno.

It’s simply reflective of how Steam publishes those numbers on its own platform. For some reason, Fedora isn’t explicitly accounted for while it’s very likely to possess a huge chunk of the “Other” category.

To illustrate this point, we’ll look at Boiling Steam’s latest report. It uses ProtonDB’s data to give us (possible) insight on what’s found within “Other” (that accounts for 23.27%). Before I delve further, it has to be said that ProtonDB’s data contrasts Steam’s in significant ways. It’s not a huge departure, but one definitely notices a slight discrepancy between the numbers.

FWIW, as per Boiling Steam’s report, we find the following numbers for Fedora (and related derivatives):

• Fedora - 8.7%
• Nobara - 5.2%
• Bazzite - 4.5%

Which (together) amounts to 18.4%.

If we would scale this down, as Boiling Steam’s report doesn’t include SteamOS Holo^[1], we’d get:

• Fedora - 6%
• Nobara - 3.6%
• Bazzite - 3.1%

Totaling to 12.7% this time. And thus, it('s at least likely to) constitute the majority of the “Other” category.