Is gonna go up, Elon said they’ll have full autonomous this year! /s

Jack will never come back, too much space to apeace a fraction of the total users.

Could you not wrap it in thin foil to make a faraday cage? If done well it should prevent any signals for going in or out.

puts on thin foil hat

About their smart bidet running on arch

Forgejo is already doing it

M2, pls

deleted by creator

Is Pihole not the simpler way, since it configures Unbound for you?

Love mdma, I belive that it could help PTSD, but I agree with you, is no benefit for anyone to rush such a thing.

The whole vive is "they stopted it cause is “drugs”, but like, those are good reasons to stop any trials.

Graphene os + a work profile + sandboxed play services allows you to have some baking apps. Ive got 3 and they all work without a hitch.

Is has been discussed, I read once here: https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/475-wallet-google-pay/2 about it, but sadly the tweet is gone and I dont remeber the exact reason.

Well… Is not a caveman theory… Is actually kind of a new topic in nutrition…

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9036397/

This paper even address the first law of thermodymics, which you really do not seem to understad. Bodies do not use 100% of the energy in your food, the usaged percentage is variable and what is not use you just shit, conserving the 1st law.

And true, people go back to eat too much, but you can’t assure that 100% of the cases of weight regain after diet are coused because of that, there are:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6082688/

This is quite the hot topics between nutrition experts, but I’m guessing you already know that, since your seem to belive to already have analysed all possible information about this ultra-complex topic.

Yes, CICO works most of the time if you count well enough, but there are somw cases where your hormones will just fuck you over.

I really can’t tell if you’re trolling or if you reaaaaaaallyyyyy think you know what the 1st law actually means but are not capable enough to see that open systems are not bound by it in the way you think they are.

https://bookdown.org/asvn90/Understanding-Thermodynamics/the-first-law-for-open-systems.html

Take a look at chapter 5.2, it explains how the 1st law applies to open systems -like your body, in case you don’t get why I am talking about open systems-

In shot

Food = energy + shit (+others)

You can shit more or less, depending on how your body process food. I hope that one is simple enough for you.

Also: maybe is easier to understand https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPrjP4A_X4s

Here is a explanation:

When you eat, your body process the food and tries to utilize it for different things (Nutrients absorpsion, muscle/fat/bone repair and creation and so on). This processes are not 100% independent and they are modulated via several ways, as an example insulin regulates(or inhibits, depends who you ask) lyposis, which is the fat burning process.

There are a large number of ways to regulate all of this process and to some extend they all regulate each other constantly.

Now, the yoyo effect, i.e. ganing lots of ways after finishing a diet: After your body runs in a deficit for a whiley your body is behaving as is food was scarse then, when you increase your calorie intake your body uses its enzymes, hormones and whatnot to assure that the most energy is saved, it can do this, going back to the fat example by raising your insuling levels more than usual and so, storing more energy from the same meal.

It makes sense from a evolutionary view also, your body can’t try to store everything when your starving, since it needs the extra effort to go get food, then, when you find the food it tries to store it all and also, since it has enough you can spare some hours of letargy, i.e. why peoole get sleepy after a big meal. Also relevant, when you are in a deficit your body starts pumpling growth hormones, even tho it has nothing to grow off, but the hormone is there to kick start creation as soon as some extra energy is avaliable.

Of course that, compunded with how normally people tent to underestimate their calorie intake is even worst. Which happens a lot.

Chaos, not anarchy!

Op, I have been suffering from sleep issues for years, what I found it works:

1. Sleep/Awake (roughtly) at the same time every day
2. No alcohol
3. No Caffeine after 15:00
4. Weed (if you don’t want/can getting high, CBD is legal almost everywhere, but tbh CBD does nothing for me
5. Melotonin (otc, helps sleep, not adictive)
6. Sports

Amazing solution, didn’t arrive to that one, I was thinking just making a timing constraint to reveal the number that would make the precaculation practically imposible, but the commitment schmeme is waaaay more elegant.

Where I come from we just take the meat of the fruit and blend it with milk or water (and yes, we call that juice), I you have never try it, go get a ripe mango, blend it with milk and you’ll have a delicious smootie, you can use water but imh milk is superior for that use case.

Of cours that is no possible with oranges for example, but there a aloooooot mor fruits than oranges.

If you ever have the oportunity to have some guayaba-milk-juice, don’t pass it up, the shit is the nectar of the gods.

Not very important, even if generated by a single actor N has not such a big importance. If I were implementing something like this I’d just probably make it -hardcoded-.

If you reaaaallyyyy want to decide on a N on the fly, I’d put a restricction (a<Nx<b) make each participant generate a Nx and then sum then all, -multiply’em If you wanna be hardcore- But I’d be tricky to get it right, for example a party might be able to consistently make N whatever the max value of N is by making their Nx very big -Which, well, I don’t really know how it would benefit that party and how would they exploit it-. Maybe using a operation like a XOR on the Nx would be robust enough, and would mitigate the kind of attack that I described above

Tl;dr: you can just have a random party generate it.

1. Decide on a random N and what tails (even) and heads (uneven) mean.

2. Each party generates a random number

3. Combine the numbers with a conmutative operation of some sort, the harder the operation the better.

4. Take the hash N times. (Can be done independently by each participant)

(4.5) optional: for extra robustness, do some hard-to-calculate transformations to the result of 4. (Can be done independently by each party)

5. The final result is either uneven or even === coin toss. (0 will be treathed as even*.*)

This is not infalibe, one party could get all the numbers a precalculate a answer to get a specific result but they will need to randomly try numbers. adding some timing constrains, using big numbers and hard operations would make that sort of attack not really practicable.

Nice question, had fun thinking about it!

Could you dm it to me?