I would imagine they’d be stupid if they did use AI. I’ve seen people use AI to “write” technical documentation that I have had to review. That shit goes straight into the bin because the time I spend fixing all the AI nonsense is about the same amount of time it would take for me to write the document myself. It’s gotten to a point where I straight up reject all AI generated documentation because I know fixing them is a waste of time.

I imagine legal documents have to be at least as precise as technical documents, so if they’re checking the output I seriously doubt they’re saving any time or money by using AI.

But will it fuck up my formatting when I add an image?

Imagine thinking you’re so important that others should care about your opinion.

He still has the 10th most subscribed channel on Youtube, him endorsing Linux is huge due to the reach he has. His video has 3.2 million views, other content creators are making their reaction videos to his video. You don’t have to like him to see how big this is for Linux.

While I don’t have an issue taking a dump on Bethesda this time the issue is either with Nvidia or Epic. The 50 series has been a shit show and wouldn’t be surprised if the flagship model somehow preforms worse than last Gen cards. And UE5 is also a shit show. Games made with UE5 look like blurry shits unless you buy a $1000+ top of the line GPU because it’s also a massive performance hog. If you’re playing a game that looks like shit and runs like shit, it’s probably using UE5.

They literally did more than just upscale some textures.

There’s no way Google would voluntarily sell Chrome. Unfortunately for them, they might be forced to sell Chrome.

They don’t want to buy the browser. They want to buy the brand and the users. Chrome makes up over half the browser market. Think of all the data they could extract from Chrome users. It would cost significantly more to fork chromium and grow the user base to a point where they could extract anything valuable from them, and that’s assuming they’d be successful enough to make it happen.

Another thing to bring up for ancient greybeards like me, Oblivion is almost 20 years old. There’s an entire generation of gamers who have never played Oblivion and are now getting their first time experience.

Last information is that they are moving to Steam for their 1.0 launch.

Removed by mod

It looks the same because you are more or less doing the same thing (looting and shooting) but the core motivation to do those things are very different. Battle royales are all about combat, everyone goes in with the sole purpose of winning (with some exceptions) and you win by beating the other teams. Extraction shooters “in theory” are about survival. You take your crap with you into a raid so you could find better crap to increase your chances of surviving a raid. But if you die you lose the crap you took in. Because the goal is survival extraction shooters don’t have a sole focus on combat, but rather combat is a means to an end.

Off topic but I genuinely can’t understand why people like to throw battle royales and extraction shooters into the same pot. The fact that battle royales have been immensely successful (PUBG, Fortnite, Apex) while the only extraction shooter with relative success is Escape From Tarkov (I won’t get into the details but pretty much everyone hates to play) should be indication that any similarities between the two genres are entirely superficial.

They cater to very different audiences.

It’s not a battle-royale. It’s an extraction shooter which IMO makes the outlook even worse because extraction shooters are probably the most hardcore subgenre of shooters you could have. The game is either going to pivot hard within months after launch or it’s going to flop.

If it teaches gambling

By having literally no gambling?

and has slot machine makeup,

In what way? Slot machines have a very distinct look and at best I could the small blind, big blind and boss blind columns indicating the 3 columns in a slot machine, but if that’s the thing then any game with 3 column separate 3 choices has a slot machine makeup? If you meant the game somehow uses slot machine iconography I don’t, I really don’t know what to say then. It would be completely delusional.

Anonymous Dev created a casino experience

Clearly not completely anonymous as he has no trouble presenting himself through his public name. And a casino experience according to you.

with poker at the core

Actually the core was Big Two, which makes far more sense than Poker as you’re not limited to 2 cards and can play multiple hands.

This same Dev is promoting several other games such as “slot machine deck builder” and “blackjack deck builder”.

That’s just bullshit. In fact it’s so bullshit the dev has publicly opposed gambling.

Please look at this from higher up. Something slimy is afoot.

Higher up view says you’re just peddling stupid conspiracy that has little to no basis in reality.

GTA 6 is coming out this year and it started development after RDR2. That’s 6-7 years. Cyberpunk 2077 started main production after Blood and Wine, which means development time was 4-5 years. Baldur’s Gate 3 development most likely started after DoS2, which means it was in development for 6-7 years. In fact most AAA games finish development in less than 7 years and anything going beyond 7 usually has some kind of a development hell (and usually ends up being bad).

Star Citizen has been in development for 12 years. If it released today it will be the third or fourth longest game development time, except it’s not releasing today and considering the state of the game it can easily get the top spot of the longest time in development game. It is nowhere near the standard development time of a modern AAA title. You could say SQ42 is in the modern AAA development time (if you’re being generous with the start date of the development), but even there you’re not getting the full game as the release will be episodic. Who knows how long it will take for all the episodes of SQ42 to release.

Anyone who knew Chris Roberts previous projects knew it was going to go this way. That man doesn’t know the meaning of scope.

Wait? So the other person isn’t being misogynistic? I’m lost.

Look. I don’t make the rules of misogyny. You want things to make sense, you need to look elsewhere.

His takeaway is that women are as smart as men (as in the IQ is the same) but because men have higher testosterone holding them back men are actually smarter than women. What I think he’s actually trying to say is that he’s a high testosterone misogynist.