Abandoned this profile due to lemmy.world’s federation with Threads. I have moved onto feddit.de as they are the only instance I could find defederated from Threads, hexbear, and lemmygrad.

I’m happy with my new home.

  • 4 Posts
  • 353 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle
  • I was going to link to a recent comment of mine in which I actually state my argument, but lo and behold the post full of negative comments regarding Threads federation is gone!

    That seems like some bullshit, so I’m going to share my comment here:

    I see many people purporting that users blocking Threads on an individual basis as a solution, but it’s not… Blocking Threads will not prevent Threads users’ comments in federated instances from showing up.

    Even if you block Threads, you will still see hateful, harassing, and extremist content and misinformation.

    Furthermore, even if it did block Threads engagement entirely on an individual blocking basis, it is still a failure on the instance admins to adequately protect their users and cultivate a healthy community.

    .world admins defederated with exploding heads due to hate, harassment, and extremism/misinformation. Why would they then federate with Threads which harbors the same toxic users?

    It’s a move to bring more users into the Fediverse, but it comes with costs and risks that do not justify the short-sighted gain of more users and inching towards becoming mainstream.

    Threads has been subject to mass amounts of radicalizing, extremist content, and there have also been instances of users having personal information doxxed on Threads due to Meta’s information-harvesting practices. [1]

    Threads was marketed to be open to ‘free speech’ (read: hate speech and misinformation) and encouraged the Far-Right movement to join, who have spread extremism, hate, and harassment on Threads already. [2] Threads has been a hotbed of Israel-Palestine misinformation/propaganda. [3]

    They fired fact-checkers just prior to Threads’ launch [1], however they claim they will have 3rd party fact-checkers next year. [4]

    Meta/FB/Instagram has a rampant history of illegal and unethical practices, including running experiments on their users which affected their moods and induced depression in many uninformed, non-consenting subjects. [5] Such unethical experiments could affect federated users as well.

    (Edit: As @massive_bereavement reminded me, Meta also assisted in genocide! [6])

    Meta/FB/Instagram also have a strong history of facilitating the spread of misinformation and extremism, which contributed to the January 6th insurrection attempt. [7]

    If exploding heads was defederated with because of this sort of toxic extremism, why would they want to federate with a platform plagued by that same content? One known for shortcomings moderating it? And one which comes from a company with a long history of unethical and illegal practices regarding users?

    Due to these issues and Meta’s rampant history of unethical and illegal business practices, there should be no federation with Threads for the well-being of the users in this instance.

    I have donated to the .world instance since my first week here, but should they continue with federating with Threads, I will be cancelling my donations and finding an instance that won’t undermine the safety and well-being of their users for a boost of (largely toxic) new users and an inch towards being mainstream.

    The gains are immediate but minimal, and come at great costs which do not warrant federating with Threads (IMO).


  • If you don’t like it, disconnect.

    I agree with your comment, but just have to point out this is where I’m at. I have no interest interacting with Threads and blocking the instance on Lemmy only blocks posts (not Threads users’ ability to comment throughout federated instances).

    I was about to resume working on growing a community I created and planned on making a few more, but I have zero interest in my communities interacting with Threads.

    I thought I found a great new home in lemmy.world, but I’m getting ready to strip my community of all my content and stop my donations to .world. If I wanted to deal with Meta users, I’d use one of their privacy/rights infringing platforms…

    I know this is a divisive topic and I’m not interested in debating it here.








  • If the “vast majority of lemmy users” start demand things from their admins while excusing themselves from contributing in any meaningful way, yes, I’d disregard their opinions as well.

    Boy, you really ought to consider taking a critical thinking class at your local community college or something…

    You’re still trying to build a strawman argument. When your foundation is compromised, you don’t keep building on it…

    It’s clear you’re going to use disingenuous argumentative tactics and fallacies. If your next comment is just as juvenile, I’m not going to bother responding. Again, these arguments are invalid upon arrival, being logical fallacies and all…



  • GONADS125@lemmy.worldtoFediverse@lemmy.worldThe Fediverse is working just as intended.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Nice strawman attempt! There’s no reason for me to even argue with you when your argument is a fallacy and automatically invalid.

    Using your ridiculous logic, you must think the vast majority of lemmy users don’t hold any value or merit? Because the vast majority of us are not hosting our own instances.

    Being an active and constructive user, creating and moderating communities, and fighting misinformation are positive qualities for online communities.

    Edit: I’ve also been donating to Ruud since my first week on this platform, so that’s yet another reason your argument is totally incorrect. But I’ll definitely be stopping my donations if Threads ends up being federated with.


  • GONADS125@lemmy.worldtoFediverse@lemmy.worldThe Fediverse is working just as intended.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I disagree that they aren’t selling out.

    I consider it to be as such when this move isn’t supported by most of their userbase, they misframe that blocking Threads is a viable solution for the rampant issues with hate/extremism, and the decision puts their users at risk (both in the form of extremism/harassment and exploitation by Meta).

    It’s an inch towards becoming mainstream, but the costs outweigh the benefits IMO. I believe it’s hypocritical to defederate from exploding heads and then turn around and federate with Threads.

    I think misleading users into believing they can block Threads (only the posts), making a decision against the majority of their community’s wishes, and instead subjecting them to potential harassment, misinformation and exploitation is selling out.



  • I created [email protected] and have been planning on trying to revive my efforts to grow the community, but I’m sure hell not doing that if Threads is being incorporated. I’m instead going to strip the community of all of the content I posted.

    I also want to create a community for my city, but I’m never going to do that on an instance that allows Threads/Meta incorporation. Also have wanted to recreate r/OldSkaters from reddit.

    If I wanted to deal with Meta, I’d make an account on one of their privacy/rights-infringing platforms.

    As established already, blocking Threads does not block user comments from showing up. Even if it did, I still would not host a community on an instance federated with Threads unless there was a way for the communities themselves to fully block Threads interaction.

    But the only way to fully block Threads is by defederating from it.



  • That’s such a misinformative false ‘solution’ people keep peddling…

    No, blocking Threads on the individual user level does not stop comments made by Threads users from showing up on federated instances, even for users who block Threads.

    That means users who block Threads will still see hate/extremism and are still subject to potential harassment by toxic Threads users.



  • GONADS125@lemmy.worldtoFediverse@lemmy.worldThe Fediverse is working just as intended.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Edit: Since so many people are misinformed: No, blocking Threads on an individual basis is not a solution. This only blocks posts from Threads showing up in your feed. It does not block Threads users’ comments from spreading hate and extremism throughout federated instances, and lemmy users will still be subject to potential harassment from Threads users. (See the harassment of the LGBTQ+ community on Threads for examples…)

    Here’s a comment of mine that states my argument against federating with Threads.

    Also, I was not trying to debate the issue here. I was looking for recommendations for alternative instances… I’d appreciate anyone actually responding to my comment.

    Original comment: Anybody have recommendations on a decent instance that won’t be federating with Threads? Maybe one that allows community creation but isn’t full of tankies?

    I’m jumping ship from .world if they go through with federating with Threads. Such a shame to see the effort put into building this great instance come undone.

    This place decided to disregard what the majority of their users want and turn the neighborhood to shit way faster than reddit. I thought we’d at least have a couple years before instance admins started selling out to such a shitty company that’s going to make the fediverse a less safe place for their users.

    Meta will also do anything they can to EEE and I’m not convinced the fediverse is as invulnerable to such exploitation as some users seem to be.