Flex@lemmy.worldtoPC Gaming@lemmy.ca•Next-gen AMD CPUs could feature up to 32 cores per die
17·
4 months agoThreadripper 7000 went up to 64 cores with 8 dies (excluding IO die) , so 8 cores per die.
Threadripper 7000 went up to 64 cores with 8 dies (excluding IO die) , so 8 cores per die.
Wasn’t there an issue with themes deleting user data on kde recently?
Lemmy has better user retention than Diablo IV confirmed
Interesting news but I don’t really get how this is self-hosted?
This is to be expected. The question now is where will it stabilize amd will it start growing again after?
What are people saying to be calm for? Nobody way raising alarm
I’m very interested to see where it settles. It should give in indication of what percentage of people are able/willing to use lemmy in it’s current state.
The fediverse is such a cool project but it can be pretty rough from a usability standpoint.
Not quite an e-core but the goal is the same: Make more efficient use of the available die space by packing in more, slower cores.
The difference is that Intel’s e-cores achieve this by having a different architecture and support less features than their p-cores. E-cores for example do not support multi threading. E-cores are about 1/4 the size of a o-core.
AMD’s 4c cores support the same features and have the same IPC as full zen 4 cores but operate at a lower clock speed. This reduces thermal output of the core, allowing them to pack in the circuitry much more densely.
Undoubtedly Intel’s e-cores take advantage of this effect as well and they are in fact quite a bit smaller than 4c: a 4c core is about 1/2 the size of a zen 4 core. The advantage of AMD’s approach is that having the cores be the same simplifies the software side of things.