

I would presume so, yes.
I would presume so, yes.
Nuclear bombs are extremely stable when not armed. If you blow one up with external explosives it will just break.
Cheddar is a village in southern England
…and Maasdam is in the Netherlands
so, when you drop an egg on the floor, you increased its entropy too much, and since entropy isn’t reversible, your dropped egg isn’t recoverable
“Harvard scientist Rachel Greene”
Everyone’s happy
not being honest doesnt mean you always lie
I mean, in an atmosphere of pure oxygen, technically…
oh yeah, just giving in to opression is easier than fighting it, ain’t it?
I am squarely on the reddit should lose this side.
Anthropic may be breaking copyright, but not Reddit’s copyright. Sure maybe Anthropic should be sued, but not by Reddit.
Shit in My Hands?
come to the dork side
For search I’m really happy with Kagi
I am optimistic about self driving, just not Teslas. Unlike other self driving cars, Tesla is exlusively reliant on cameras. Others, like Waymo, have cameras, lidarr sensors and radar.
A usb stick with a live linux iso is generally enough
On the contrary, that’s why it’s perfect. There is so much evidence in so many different context that positive reinforcement yields better results than negative.
This is congruent with your donkey example.
You don’t need to be a journalist to copy/paste a title verbatim
The majority of the rest of the world has 220-230v per phase, with three phases. using all three phases gives you access to ~400v
Yup. I don’t think training should be considered breaking copyright. Regurgitating though should.
There are examples of use cases besides the right now obvious one of LLMs “creating” “original” content.
One that comes to my mind is indexing books. Allowing for people to search for books based on a description.
It’s not one, its several
https://www.atomicarchive.com/almanac/broken-arrows/index.html