

Usually adhd is more associated with issues in dopaminergic systems, but reducing it to that doesn’t really do the phenomenon justice.


Usually adhd is more associated with issues in dopaminergic systems, but reducing it to that doesn’t really do the phenomenon justice.


Amphetamines and methamphetamine are not the same. Different chemicals have different effects.


ADHD meds are not meth. They’re chemically similar, but H2O2 is just one oxygen away from water. The meds are stimulants, yes, but the popular “it’s meth” thing is a misrepresentation.
Should’ve used a logit model instead of a linear probability model, eh?


World-2023 ESN Publications and London Organisation of Skills Development Ltd
About 100000 pages. If you read a page per minute, continuously without breaks you’ll lose over 60 days of economic activity to this. This would massively disrupt the world if everyone had to read it.


Go tell this to a fencepost near your home.


Get better soon


To be clear: the direction I’d like to see isn’t ignoring larger-scale changes but embracing that these things are linked. Companies don’t burn fuel for fun, but for profit (or non-capitalist modes of resource allocation - if the central party committee decides to satiate the people’s hunger for meat and cars, that’s also a problem). And the profit there comes from all of us, individually as well as collectively. So action against that probably should also happen on both levels.


I’m being a bit annoying about it because the companies don’t burn all that crap for fun but, as you laid out, for our collective consumption patterns. I developed the impression that the whole “x companies do y% of emissions!” thing, similar to “no ethical consumption” reminders tends to fulfill a function not aimed at motivating larger-scale changes (e.g. banning animal agriculture wholly instead of making an individual choice to not consume em; banning ICE cars from being produced/sold while creating comprehensive public transport instead of merely biking to work yourself) but at detaching oneself from the role we do actually play in society. (Also, smaller/individual scale weirdoes are a good source of activists that can radiate social structures out into general society)


No, why do they produce all the emissions?


Huh, odd, why do they do this?


Horrible news tbh


Or you could pour river water down your socks, it’s quick, it’s easy, and it’s free!
Correct, some contracts cannot be done. Depending on the specifics, the illegal parts of the contract are unenforceable, or the entire thing is null and void. Employers often hate this, because it limits the exploitation they can enact upon employees.


No, it’s not. Standard error of the mean estimate is SD/sqrt(n-1), so it depends on the signal/effect to noise ratio how much you can learn from it. SE of the mean difference for a between subjects design is slightly different but not miles off from that. You can squeeze even more info out of it by using within subjects designs.
What makes you think a sample size of 50 is irrelevant?


Lovecraft was especially racist by the standards of his time, though. https://www.reddit.com/r/writing/comments/1897rk2/was_lovecraft_racist_even_by_the_standards_of_his/
Antiemetics prevent you from puking. It’s the antimemetics division which doesn’t exist.
Good author, too, iirc. I think this story’s also by them: https://qntm.org/mmacevedo
Great song!
How’s the weather in Tyrol these days, Anton?
I’ve never seen it prescribed nor seen anyone researching it, I wonder if it’s a US thing?