• 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle
  • I’m from France. Getting a rifle is pretty easy, you “just” have to get a psych evaluation and a shooting club registration / hunting license. But that gets you long, manual weapons with small magazines. You can keep the gun if your license expires.

    Then you can get a stronger license if your shooting club vets for you. This allows you to get handguns and semi auto rifles.

    Any auto gun or explosive is basically only authorized for use for the military.

    Oh and anything that can be used as a weapon is prohibited from being carried around in public spaces (yes, it is that vague), and protective equipment is subject to authorization as well (gas masks, bulletproof vests etc)

    You can read more on Wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearms_regulation_in_France

    Edit: Wikipedia does not seem to explain it, but A class weapons are basically military only. B class is what you get through shooting club vetting. C class is for anyone registered by a club / hunting license. D is adults only, with exceptions for criminals etc



  • Aiastarei@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlIts happening
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Yes and it is being thoroughly investigated, as it should be. But so far nothing has been found, so sensationalism is only detrimental as:

    • it takes away focus from materials that have actually been found to be harmful
    • puts public pressure on researchers, and if they don’t find something quick it might be the end of the whole field, and then they might have difficulties funding research on future polymers
    • builds up anxiety about something we can’t do anything about (the plastics are there and they’re here to stay for a while)















  • I very much disagree with the “no downvote” opinion. It leads to homophobic, racist and generally bigoted comments getting much more displayed appreciation than they should (see: any YouTube comments interaction).

    You can say it’s the job of the moderation to take care of that kind of hateful content, but I prefer that content to be displayed as a rejected and challenged onpinion rather than not addressed or ignored. And for that, a quick downvote + sourced debate is better than an unending thread of wordsoup where even the most hateful argument only gets shown some love in the form of upvotes.



  • The estimated free labor done by mods is valued at around 3.5m a year, how are they gonna find that amount of manpower? And how are they gonna properly vet these mods in such short notice?

    Mods already are carefully picked and yet slips happen often, if they rush a replacement (which they will have to do if they force new mods) then moderation issues will be a big issue on reddit