Am I reading the correct bit?

Chapter 24, section 5 - Eavesdropping

A person who unlawfully listens to or records with a technical device

1. a discussion, talk or other sounds of private life, where these are not intended for his or her knowledge and which occur or arise in a place covered by the right to domestic privacy, or
2. secretly, elsewhere than in a place covered by the right to domestic privacy, talk that is not intended for his or her knowledge or for the knowledge of any other third parties, where the circumstances are such that the speaker has no reason to believe that a third party is listening shall be sentenced for eavesdropping to a fine or to imprisonment for at most one year.

An attempt is punishable.

This to me seems like it reads against what you are saying no?

EDIT: And actually, isn’t this more about an unknown third party anyway?

We just need to ask the French for tips and advice

Nice! I’m guessing the MD/Genesis version is the same port as the PSX? Or is that the original Mickey Mania?

Last time I tried Bluesky was the start of this year, with a week had like 20 bot accounts following me, maybe 1 real person

Haha! I’ll never see this cover the same again.

And as a side note, damn I wish I had a copy of Conker’s Bad Fur Day!!!

It’s a stolen image of a Japanese voice actress, see comment above ^^ (sorry I don’t know how to link a comment on my app). This post is just rage bait by a troll

2 cups sure, but 5???

I’m pretty sure I would have a heart attack after 5 lol

Did you just fantasize about a veteran being into you as an 11yr old, now you have it stuck in your head that they were a pedo because of… Why exactly?

Am I reading this wrong?

Far out, how unhinged is this guy??

Yes of course, but the crime was still committed and she had full capability of committing the crime regardless of how it ended up for her. The question wasn’t “why are males more successful at committing a crime”, although this is where my mind went as well.

The cultural reason was what I was thinking too.

At first, physical capability popped into my mind as well, however can a woman not steal a loaf of bread? Or grab a knife and stab someone, or grab a gun and pull the trigger?

Economically able to could also lead into the gender imbalance in executive positions.

However I would like to hear the person I replied to’s reasoning instead of us guessing or putting answers in their mouth so to speak, as ‘more capable of doing so’ doesn’t really lend much to the conversation.

I know one person that managed to kick heroin about 10 years ago now. They are one of the most head strong people I know now, with an enormous amount of drive to continuously improve their own life (they have since started a family, got a career, and just purchased a home recently).

In their case, I would definitely say ‘what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger’ holds true

How so?

The math at 1103 posts (that’s what is showing for me when looking at their profile right now) ÷ 602 days is only 1.83 posts per day.

However, eyeballing their account it does seem they average 6 posts a day if they are posting, with some days dragging that average up - for example they have a day with 15 posts

“supposedly” is the keyword here

The continuous improvement is what I remember the most! At least how I remember the internet of old, it was like a constant stream of something new, from random funny links of random sites, to big new major projects surfacing. It was cool

Probably a good use case for Gopher

Ahh… but humans are primates?

So wouldn’t that make both true? Other primates would display human like qualities, while the inverse of ‘humans do primate things’ also holds true?

Thanks! But as mentioned in the title this is a owned since new item, meaning I’ve had this since I was a kid

Why wouldn’t it be? I know I for one would be super interested!