However I find myself being disagreed with quite often, mostly for not advocating or cheering violence, “by any means possible” change, or revolutionary tactics. It would seem that I’m not viewed as authentically holding my view unless I advocate extreme, violent, or radical action to accomplish it.

Those seem like two different things to me.

Edit: TO COMMUNISTS, ANARCHISTS, OR ANYONE ELSE CALLING FOR THE OVERTHROW OF SOCIETY

THIS OBVIOUSLY ISN’T MEANT FOR YOU.

  • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    You can be validly left without wanting revolution, as long as you’re ok with progress happening over the course of centuries (in a world that has about 25 years left before the majority of us are dead from man-made climate change).

      • Jayjader@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        making sure everyone is okay.

        Given the current state of the world, that would be progress.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I agree. What I should have said is that some leftists aren’t seeking progress per se, but rather to ensure everyone is okay, per se.

          One variable can be a leading indicator of another, but it’s still a different thing to be optimizing for one or the other.