Most antivirus I tested, even the paid ones, are so annoying with popups and complaining about cracks that I just take the risk and go without em

  • vegeta@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Windows defender claimed they’re bad because they are cracks, and doesn’t mention any reason it thinks that would be a virus/trojan or something I dont want

    “HackTool:Win32/crack” from games downloaded on fitgirl repacks site (the correct one)

    • elfpie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Isn’t that a matter of behavior? The crack is doing something expected from a crack and the system warns you because most wouldn’t use it without being aware. If you really trust the file, add it as an exception.

      Or do you want a software that can vet good cracks from bad cracks?

        • 0xtero@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 months ago

          Enterprise antivirus products have had PUP (Potentially Unwanted Program) category forever. Seems its categorized as “HackTool” so not malware.

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          Cracks modify executables…classic malware/virus behaviour. Almost the definition of malware.

          Which is why windows uses a file protection system since at least XP

        • MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Not at all, a crack does something to an executable file that you use. Malware would do the exact same thing.

          • dactylotheca@suppo.fi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            But you generally want that crack to do something to an executable. Do antivirus etc. tools just heuristically flag everything that looks like it modifies an executable? Lots of legitimate dev tools do that too, so it seems like it’d give a lot of false positives, but I haven’t used Windows in ages so 🤷

            • MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 months ago

              Well, how is the system supposed to know that you want the crack to do something to that executable? The anti virus just sees something is happening and flags it. It does not see a difference.

              • dactylotheca@suppo.fi
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                I definitely get what you mean, I just have no idea if antivirus tools flag anything that looks like it modifies executables. My edit to the comment you’re replying to may not have propagated to your instance yet, so here’s what I added:

                Do antivirus etc. tools just heuristically flag everything that looks like it modifies an executable? Lots of legitimate dev tools do that too, so it seems like it’d give a lot of false positives, but I haven’t used Windows in ages so 🤷

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Windows defender only lets you whitelist by file, folder, or process. You could whitelist a specific folder, but if you want to whitelist by category you’ll have to use a different antivirus product.