• leopold@lemmy.kde.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Amarok uses Qt, just like every other KDE project. Likewise, I don’t think GNOME has any project not using GTK.

      • leopold@lemmy.kde.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        What, the grey bars? Crappy is a rude way of putting it, but yes they look pretty bad. I think that’s probably an artifact from the Qt4 days. It looked fine with Oxygen. Rest looks fine to me. If you think it looks busy, well the screenshot has a lot of panels enabled, just to showcase the features. IIRC many of them are not shown by default and a user would only keep the ones they need, since the interface is customizable.

        • tsonfeir@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m not trying to be “rude.” But the line height, weird font sizes, spacing between elements. Just everything about it screams function over form. There is a way to have both. Most software that adheres to modern design principles have overcome the “janky” UI

          • 高文偉@g0v.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            @tsonfeir @leopold I think they’re more focused on fixing build errors and putting out a release for now, and leave UI updates for later. So we’re stuck with the old look for this release.

            • tsonfeir@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Whatever you do, don’t say it looks “crappy,” The abusive mods will remove your comment!!

              We can always say positive things in the sub.

              And therefore, this looks about as beautiful and modern as Windows 3.1.