I was thinking that creating communities like “kate” or “kdenlive” would help organize the instance.

Does this make sense? Or is the instance too small for that?

  • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I asked about kdenlive already. Every community needs moderators and here it seems they need to be KDE contributors

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 months ago

      Every community needs moderators it seems and here it seems they need to be KDE contributors

      Those don’t really seem like related skillsets. Community managers aren’t usually asset contributors.

      • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        When your too busy moderating the community to contribute to kde, so you lose your moderator status. You’re also too busy contributing to kde to moderate the community.

      • herrcaptain@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, it’d be great to have developers participating in discussions on here, but I don’t think most would have either the skillset or desire to moderate a community. Obviously there would be some exceptions there, but I can’t see a reason as to why it would be mandatory.

        • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Otherwise we may end up like GrapheneOS ;D a community moderated by stressed out devs with bad people skills

      • jnk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        It would make more sense to change that to “Community managers are managed by contributors”. Less effort for them and potentially better moderation.