bogokeb@futurology.today to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoAre these the supposed "benefits" of waylandfuturology.todayimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up131arrow-down162
arrow-up1-31arrow-down1imageAre these the supposed "benefits" of waylandfuturology.todaybogokeb@futurology.today to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoDepends on the implementation. The reference, Weston, is not.
minus-squareKata1yst@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 years agoWeston is by file size, about equal to xserver. But really there is more utility in Weston than xserver.
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 years agoBut it’s one monolith, same as X.
minus-squareKata1yst@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoXorg needs several of it’s extensions to function at the same level as Weston+Wayland. At minimum you’d need xorg server, proto, lib, and driver… Maybe a few other things I’m forgetting.
Depends on the implementation. The reference, Weston, is not.
Weston is by file size, about equal to xserver. But really there is more utility in Weston than xserver.
But it’s one monolith, same as X.
Xorg needs several of it’s extensions to function at the same level as Weston+Wayland. At minimum you’d need xorg server, proto, lib, and driver… Maybe a few other things I’m forgetting.