• Ann Archy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I worked at the NOC for a media company with over 3K employees. They made us use MacBook Pros 13" for our day to day sysadministrative tasks.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Laptops. Apple laptops. I don’t know but that does not sync well with administering linux networks with for me, personally. God those things were horrible. I don’t ever write it out on my CV that I can work those things, I will actively state in interviews that I have zero X/iOS experience.

        I was a Macintosh fanboy up to circa 2000, after that they changed everything and I can’t stand them anymore. I call them Apple, because Macintosh is a thing of the past.

        • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The way that I see it is that they’re unix-like laptops that have decent support contracts. Given the choice of an Apple or Windows work laptop, I go with the former. Not because I like Apple (I don’t) but because it’s a unix-like OS which doesn’t require any extra tools to ssh into things plus, it is far more stable than Windows without things constantly breaking after update Tuesday.

          I mean it when I say that I use it as a glorified ssh client. I do all of my work on a remote Linux VM via ssh. The reason that I decided to use Kitty in the first place was to make more use of the laptop hardware because it feels like a bit of a waste of their capabilities. The only other things outside of the terminal that I use with regularity are Chrome and Firefox.

      • frazorth@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        FFS, they are awful SSH clients. You can’t even easily split the screen up with multiple terminals, and by default it fucks around with the order of your desktops.

        • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Maybe the default terminal but that does have tabbing OotB (GUI+T) though, you can just open multiple windows. If you want more than that or something aestheticly pleasing, grab iTerm or Kitty. If you want terminal multiplexing, grab tmux via homebrew. Tiling WM? Amethyst works nicely.

          Plus, you don’t need any abstraction or local VM to scp local files. Bonus: The OS clipboard keys are different than the terminal control sequences.

          • frazorth@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Amethyst works okay.

            It definitely fixes a bunch of things like being able to move windows between desktops by keyboard shortcuts.

            But all other OS’ support that out the box.

            Plus, you don’t need any abstraction or local VM to scp local files.

            I don’t need that on my Fedora laptop either.

            The OS clipboard keys are different than the terminal control sequences.

            Probably the only thing that is beneficial.

            • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              I don’t need that on my Fedora laptop either.

              My experience is generally getting the option of Mac or Windows. If Fedora or another distro was an option, I’d be all about it.