sag@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoBiggest Betrayallemm.eeimagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1855arrow-down18
arrow-up1847arrow-down1imageBiggest Betrayallemm.eesag@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-squareyeehaw@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up88arrow-down2·edit-22 years agoTo use “u”, “ur”, and “your” in the same sentence is mind-blowing.
minus-squarenightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up38·2 years agoAt least they r each used correctly.
minus-squareexplodicle@local106.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoDid Zoomers just solve a huge problem that’s plagued the English-speaking world for generations?
minus-squareBlackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 years agoI think text speak is a bit older than the zoomers. But in any case, I propose u’re for the sake of grammatical correctness.
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoOk professor. Now fix their, there and they’re.
minus-squareBlackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 years agoThei’re. Just merge them. Simple.
minus-squareNoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoNo it’s an extra kink in the maze of English, double possessive forms.
To use “u”, “ur”, and “your” in the same sentence is mind-blowing.
At least they r each used correctly.
Did Zoomers just solve a huge problem that’s plagued the English-speaking world for generations?
I think text speak is a bit older than the zoomers.
But in any case, I propose u’re for the sake of grammatical correctness.
Ok professor. Now fix their, there and they’re.
Thei’re. Just merge them. Simple.
No it’s an extra kink in the maze of English, double possessive forms.
And yet here you are