The second one is not really a way to check if it’s AI, only if it may be deceiving you, and the third one’s conclusion is not “yes” but “use responsibly”, like it’s in the power of the common person to even choose to use AI and like corporations aren’t the ones pushing it with no regard to impact anyway.
The problem is those 3 questions are very vague and would need complex answers, and maybe the guy vould have been able to give these, but in any case they’re not in the article.
The answers are more like “yes”, “check the source and intent”, “yes”
The second one is not really a way to check if it’s AI, only if it may be deceiving you, and the third one’s conclusion is not “yes” but “use responsibly”, like it’s in the power of the common person to even choose to use AI and like corporations aren’t the ones pushing it with no regard to impact anyway.
The problem is those 3 questions are very vague and would need complex answers, and maybe the guy vould have been able to give these, but in any case they’re not in the article.
The third one is as close to “yes” as his weasely words will allow. I read it as a yes, anyway