I don’t understand your line of questioning. If a bad thing happens then a bad thing happens. Potential for bad things indeed makes companies likely to lock down devices if they provide them, hence the qualifier “not all works would allow it.” From an employee perspective, if you have the freedom to do it then more secure OS is more secure.
I don’t understand your line of questioning. If a bad thing happens then a bad thing happens. Potential for bad things indeed makes companies likely to lock down devices if they provide them, hence the qualifier “not all works would allow it.” From an employee perspective, if you have the freedom to do it then more secure OS is more secure.
I have a work phone.
If didn’t have a personal phone, it wouldn’t matter.
If it breaks, they have insurance to replace it immediately.
There’s no risk it will stop working because I didn’t pay the bill.
And I can’t install random crap because it’s locked down.
And they have options like remotely wipe the device, if they think something weird is happening.
From my side. The phone is turned off the microsecond I clock out.