• arcine@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    That doesn’t make sense to me, afaiu :

    GrapheneOS is NOT rooted by default, and they explicit recommend NOT to do it, because it invalidates a huge part of their privacy guarantees.

    • Honytawk@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, and Microsoft policy is just about rooted phones.

      There isn’t any reason to mention GrapheneOS, unless it is to generate unwarranted outrage.

      Which seems to be working on a lot of folk on here.

      • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well it could just be part of the collective corporate alliance that will always do anything they can to make any kind of freedom cost more for everyone. GrapheneOS is taking your freedom and not feeding on the corporate-issued fodder, and well, they don’t like that. So this is just one more small difficulty added to that choice.

        This kind of thing is only the beginning. It won’t be long before absolutely nothing will work on any freedom-oriented OS, software, hardware etc.

        Some fires need to start, and soon.

      • seang96@spgrn.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        They way Microsoft is checking for root won’t work on GrapheneOS since its done through Google play services, similar to the bank apps. It doesn’t matter if it’s rooted.

    • cmhe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      privacy guarantees

      security guarantees, not privacy guarantees.

      With root you can actually control what kind of things each app does and stores, and check what data it transmits to remote servers. But it also breaks/weakens the android security model, where apps can do, store or transmit stuff protected from the eyes of the user of the phone.

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        But it also breaks/weakens the android security model, where apps can do, store or transmit stuff protected from the eyes of the user of the phone.

        Which just sounds insane to me. It’s security through obscurity, which is in and of itself a bad plan, to protect 3rd parties against you … on your own frigging device.