Clearly sticking with one is medically better but I don’t see much debate about which one - there’s a few vague statements that standard time matches the inertia we have biologicaly but I’ve yet to see a considered argument looking deeper into it, unfortunately.
For those in distant latitudes it’s a big deal - and that seems to be where most of us live…
At least they went forward rather than the status quo of ‘normal’ time
A lot of medical boards prefer permanent standard time.
https://savestandardtime.com/statements/
Thanks that’s interesting!
Clearly sticking with one is medically better but I don’t see much debate about which one - there’s a few vague statements that standard time matches the inertia we have biologicaly but I’ve yet to see a considered argument looking deeper into it, unfortunately.
For those in distant latitudes it’s a big deal - and that seems to be where most of us live…