“Telegram is not a private messenger. There’s nothing private about it. It’s the opposite. It’s a cloud messenger where every message you’ve ever sent or received is in plain text in a database that Telegram the organization controls and has access to it”

“It’s like a Russian oligarch starting an unencrypted version of WhatsApp, a pixel for pixel clone of WhatsApp. That should be kind of a difficult brand to operate. Somehow, they’ve done a really amazing job of convincing the whole world that this is an encrypted messaging app and that the founder is some kind of Russian dissident, even though he goes there once a month, the whole team lives in Russia, and their families are there.”

" What happened in France is they just chose not to respond to the subpoena. So that’s in violation of the law. And, he gets arrested in France, right? And everyone’s like, oh, France. But I think the key point is they have the data, like they can respond to the subpoenas where as Signal, for instance, doesn’t have access to the data and couldn’t respond to that same request.  To me it’s very obvious that Russia would’ve had a much less polite version of that conversation with Pavel Durov and the telegram team before this moment"

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      But again, you either read the source to confirm there’s nothing nefarious, or… you trust the programmers.

      Which is not a problem, but it is a choice to trust. All I’m pointing out. :)

      • desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Well yeah everything is a choice when trust is the matter, but there is a difference between choosing a community project that can be audited by different transparent parties and choosing a private company on their own servers (even on source available projects)