“Telegram is not a private messenger. There’s nothing private about it. It’s the opposite. It’s a cloud messenger where every message you’ve ever sent or received is in plain text in a database that Telegram the organization controls and has access to it”

“It’s like a Russian oligarch starting an unencrypted version of WhatsApp, a pixel for pixel clone of WhatsApp. That should be kind of a difficult brand to operate. Somehow, they’ve done a really amazing job of convincing the whole world that this is an encrypted messaging app and that the founder is some kind of Russian dissident, even though he goes there once a month, the whole team lives in Russia, and their families are there.”

" What happened in France is they just chose not to respond to the subpoena. So that’s in violation of the law. And, he gets arrested in France, right? And everyone’s like, oh, France. But I think the key point is they have the data, like they can respond to the subpoenas where as Signal, for instance, doesn’t have access to the data and couldn’t respond to that same request.  To me it’s very obvious that Russia would’ve had a much less polite version of that conversation with Pavel Durov and the telegram team before this moment"

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I wouldn’t say it’s worse. It technically claims to have end-to-end encryption while telegram doesn’t. I wouldn’t trust it at all because it’s from Meta, but I don’t see how you can say the one at least claiming to have encryption is worse than the one that just flat out doesn’t have it.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      End to end encryption is worth nothing when WhatsApp have access to the encryption key. And the fact that all photos you see on WhatsApp are saved on your phone without encryption means that it’s only encrypted when it’s sent, nowhere else.

      I also have very suspicious examples of advertising linked to WhatsApp conversations.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yes, it’s not good. We’re talking about if it is worse than telegram though. Not if it’s simply good or not.

        I thought I was pretty fucking clear on that in my original comment?

        • bouh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          32 minutes ago

          From my perspective, I’d rather have an enemy of country to have my personal data. It’s far harder to use for them than for my country.