Does a license like this exist?

  • asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I found this, which adds additional text to the existing licenses to prohibit training an AI on the licensed code: https://github.com/non-ai-licenses/non-ai-licenses

    Though, per OSI’s definition, your code probably would no longer be open source, since training an LLM is technically considered a field of endeavour:

    OSD number 6:

    The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic research.

    • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      If we can play semantics, the program (the compiled binary) can be used for anything with no field restrictions.
      But the code is not the program itself, it’s the recipe, and usage could be restricted in some specific ways.
      In my opinion, since free licenses already have restrictions regarding distribution, saying AI models trained on this data are derivative works and must be licensed compatible (ie training data set, methods and models themselves being free).
      I feel it’s a better middle ground where the freedom of users are not violated nor restricted, and the code/knowledge stays free

    • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      We need a new field of licensing, something like Ethical Source License. With AI being a thing on-the-field, and even before tbh, Open Source has alas become a paradigm of the past.

    • hperrin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Maybe you could say that AI training is not a use of the program, it is a use of the source code.