cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/59613920

Mullvad also pointed to other instances of alleged attempts to “escalate censorship and mass surveillance” in the UK, citing efforts to force Apple to install backdoors in its end-to-end encrypted cloud service, proposals that could introduce “client-side scanning and government spyware on all UK phones”, and government plans to fast-track legislation requiring identity verification for VPN use.

  • techpeakedin1991@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Instead of your ISP seeing every site you go to, a different company sees every site you go to.

    VPNs have their uses, but avoiding surveillance is not one of those uses.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      exactly as you say, a different company that we can actually choose, unlike our ISP, and which we can decide whether to trust. Mullvad have shown they can be trusted.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I guess if you don’t see any difference between a government supported telecom company and a company that exists in different nation that has a necessarily hostile relationship to the local government, then sure they are comparable.