Pretend the $20 million is guaranteed, and if anything will increase slightly over time.

What problems could be significantly improved for $20 million?

(I am dreaming of winning the $1.55 billion Powerball drawling. Then taking the lumpsum, posting taxes, investing, and spending 4% each and every year. I understand that the actual may be more, or less than the started amount.)

  • neptune@dmv.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Start a charity foundation, but pay poor people in your community to lead it, instead of local millionaires.

  • room_raccoon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would get a really nice house with a big fancy kitchen and then continue being a hermit, except I’d do a lot more drugs

  • Dandroid@dandroid.app
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I came into an unspendable amount of cash, I would make it my full time job to research things to donate to. Charities, or any charitable organizations, medical research, housing the homeless, feeding/infrastructure/sanitation for poor countries, open source projects, etc. But I don’t want to donate to just anyone. I don’t want to donate to those shitty fake charities that use their donations to line the pockets of their top people. That’s why I would spend a considerabe amount of time researching these groups.

    The way I see it, after I buy all the things I want, a house, a fancy car, etc. I couldn’t possibly spend more than $1M a year on my family. That gives me $19M a year to donate. I don’t really care to keep a cent more.

    • MNByChoice@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are probably spot-on. While I am able to do some things, a charity that is already doing things will likely be better at it.

  • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d donate a quarter for 4 years to my city to create a biking network, with some smaller portion donated after the 4 years for maintenance.

    I’d almost certainly help the local schools get up to date teaching materials and try to supplement their income by literally just gifting them money. There’s only around 1000 teachers in my city, so it wouldn’t be too hard to do that.

    Obviously myself a senator and representative.

    Then idk. Get a personal chef and personal trainer?

    • MNByChoice@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Giving to the teachers is great. I had looked up my school system’s budget and got discouraged, but a few 10’s of thousands each as gifts to the teachers and staff is more affordable.

  • qooqie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How I always imagined it was I would live a nice middle class life with no worries for bills and shit. Then with the rest of the 19.7 million or so I would run a non-profit charity for people in locations that are unable to receive potentially life saving medications or treatments. Think abortions in the US as a major one, I’d want to help women get to a state they can safely get an abortion and then help them protect that info. Abortion bans are a classist issue, rich won’t be affected and they’re the ones who generally vote for this shit. But yeah that’s my dream, eventually I’d hope to get enough funding or money to expand that to a world wide endeavor with my own hospitals setup in regions where I can offer help the best and guarantee info protection.

    Oh and I’d take a lesson from the fediverse and make my funding and how it’s used be free for viewing and pretty much presented first so people can trust my charity.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Quit work and take lighter loads in school.

    Buy a nice house in Maine right on the water.

    Buy a supercar, and all the motorcycles I could ever want.

    Go on crazy adventures like an Appalachian trail thru-hike.

    All this would be less than 10% of my yearly income. The other 90% would go to charity, helping the homeless and bolstering free and open source software.

  • BeefPiano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago
    • UBI for people who are currently unhoused. This is proven to increase the economic prosperity of the entire region, leads to better outcomes than shelters, and is cheaper than current homelessness support systems.
    • Buy medical debt. You can clear someone’s $150,000 debt for like $200.
    • MNByChoice@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Great idea. Some cities are doing this now. I feel once it becomes widespread, it will be gamed and prices will increase.

      • BeefPiano@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s why it’s a stepping stone to actual UBI. The U means you can’t game it. Give billionaires $10,000/yr too. Then tax the shit out of carbon to pay for it.

    • mke_geek@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Buy medical debt. You can clear someone’s $150,000 debt for like $200.

      How do you do this?

  • MNByChoice@midwest.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    $20 million is a lot, but not an infinite amount. As the cash flow is close to guaranteed, one could get into long term projects and hire staff.

    Paying total compensation of $100K, one could hope ~200 people. No money left for offices though.

    I would consider increasing the local standard of living by buying a few minimum wage type businesses and over paying a little, ~5%. I would hope that this causes an employee shortage and increases wages. Continue raising wages at a rate the other businesses can keep up with. My reasoning is that I can only hire so many people, but increasing the prevalent wages will benefit far more people.

    I also think I could open a at-cost medical clinic. I don’t know what that would cost, but I bet someone will tell me really quickly once I have the money.

    I don’t think I would have the money to:

    • Set up a new bus system.
    • Setup district heating for a town

    I feel like I am playing “small ball” and not grasping the opportunities.

  • tooclose104@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    All mine and my family debts paid. Immediate and extended. Friends too. Then a life of leisure followed by paying the debts of the strangers I meet along the way.

    • pokexpert30@lemmy.pussthecat.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That first parts is the best way to get harassed to hell and back. You don’t really want to give money to everyone, they’ll come back to beg some more, and get angry/violent/dangerous when you won’t anymore.

      • tooclose104@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s the magic of not giving a shit after. But good point, it’s entirely possible to do this to some extent as an anonymous benefactor. And at $20mil annually guaranteed income I could always hire someone to do it for me.

        Also, I’d be buying remote wilderness and building a self sustaining off grid homestead and not telling most people how to find me. I don’t like visitors.

  • Nindelofocho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Id like to buy some properties and rent them out super cheap to those in need. Cheap not free so that its a bit more sustainable in the long term and the money would go back into the properties. Id also like to do a thing where once a year the tenants get to skip a month of rent or so

  • PlasmaDistortion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would identify people in need that are renting a home and taking good care of it. Then I would buy the home and sell it to them for $1.

    • LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know this is pie in the sky, but look into how habitat for humanity does this. You would be causing a lot of trouble for those families.

      Tax burdens for the purchase, because you’re essentially giving them a lot of money. Kind of like how the people Opera gave cars to couldn’t always afford the taxes and ended up having to sell the car.

      Also, predatory lenders look for people in that situation and trick them into getting loans on the house to get “free” cash from the equity and then the people just immediately lose their house and end up in the same place.

      There are ways to protect them from all of the above, just need a little more than just “give house to good people”

      • Bizarroland@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah it’s probably smarter to purchase the homes under a trust and then rent them to low-income people for the cost of owning the home the taxes the insurance and a maintenance fund, broken down into a group fund average with a company on retainer and the salary of three people to manage and maintain all of that.

        Depending on where you are even 5 million a year worth of homes could be anywhere between 10 and 50 houses every single year added to the group.

        And depending where you are and how that works out that would mean home rental prices somewhere in the $400 to $900 a month price, well below the market average, and well below what these poor people would have to spend to maintain the housing and the associated taxes and insurance fees anyway.

        No surprise $15,000 roof jobs. No surprise $5,000 HVAC jobs. No surprise $800 dishwasher replacements.

        All of that maintained and optimized by a fairly simple payment, and the only downside to that is that it would not directly boost the renters wealth via property value increase.

        If you then put say like a 5-year cap on how long somebody could rent your property at cost (extending that optionally until their youngest kid turns 21), then that should givethe renters plenty enough time to sort out their financial situations and to accumulate wealth to purchase their own homes or to get themselves into a better position in life, and then you could pass that savings onto the next person.

  • orangeNgreen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve daydreamed about that Powerball jackpot as well. I’d spend as much time traveling the world. There’s so much out there to see, and I’ve only ever really spent time in a small part of my own country. And I’m not talking about a few days here and there in new places. I’m talking about spending weeks at a time experiencing other cultures.

  • June@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Quit my job

    Pay off and renovate my house.

    Buy a new car, something nice but not over the top.

    Set up services for my neighborhood to drag the people round me out of poverty and ensure every kid gets the chance to get a good education.

    Ensure all housing in my neighborhood is up to code and in good shape/safe to be lived in.

    Pay off the debt of every person in my neighborhood, prioritizing medical and student debt.

    Buy the people I love the things they need, set up trusts for their kids, pay off their debt, help them financially without enabling them into their bad habits.

    Feels like that should probably reach $20m fairly quickly.

    Become a landlord that makes housing actually accessible driving down prices and providing safe places for people in my neighborhood to live.

    • jaackf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Whilst I am very anti landlord, that last point is interesting.

      Say, if someone had enough money to buy out thousands of houses and made them cheapest around, undercutting everyone, then sold them to the occupants if they wanted to buy… Would that somehow fix the renting crisis we’re in today?

      • June@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m also anti-landlord, because of how the system is built. But if someone was independently wealthy and approached it as a philanthropic endeavor it could be different and solve the housing crisis for at least some. I wouldn’t be in it to make money, I’d be in it to give people that need somewhere to live a place that they can afford. And yes, eventually buy if they want to, though not everyone with limited income can afford the up front costs associated with owning (like when an appliance breaks, or there’s another problem with the building) so I understand why some wouldn’t want to. But if I had the means to take a loss on it, and did, it feels very different than the capitalist landlord squeezing tenants to make their salary.