The truth on the other hand, is the unshakable reality that has driven every sanction, every sabotage attempt, and every assassination plot since 1959: Cuba is a threat only to an idea. It is a threat to the imperial doctrine that a small, poor nation in America’s ‘backyard’ must not be allowed to choose socialism, to provide free healthcare and education, and homes to live without the permission of Washington.
For this sin of self-determination, the crime of building a society where capital is not god, Cuba has been punished with the most enduring economic siege in modern history. This is not an ‘embargo’, which I consider to be a sterile, political term. It is a total blockade, designed to constrict and cripple. It is enforced by a plethora of laws with names like the Helms-Burton Act, which terrorises foreign companies from trading with the Island and allows the US to seize ships in international waters. Its goal, as US politician Robert Torricelli once admitted, was to…
‘Wreak havoc’.

  • racoon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    British and Soviets had their famines in India, Ireland and Ukraine. Americans need their own Holodomor

  • peoflor@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 hours ago

    For those who say it’s a hoax, look up videos of any Cuban on YouTube and turn on the subtitles.

  • amide@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I hope and pray that the Cuban people stand together and persevere. May this be the final nail in the empire of evil.

  • Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    And because all of this shit they have been throwing on the Cuba, they can claim socialism doesn’t work.

  • The_Sasswagon@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I think, based on conversations I have with people in real life and read online, that the people in the US haven’t challenged the 60 years of propaganda about Cuba, and believe it a totalitarian nightmare dictatorship.

    I have a close friend who went to Cuba for ecological research (did you know they still have intact reefs) a few years ago, and when they would tell people they were going to Cuba, the most common reaction was a fearful “that’s scary” and a confused, almost accusatory “why”.

    I don’t think they realize that everyone else can just go to Cuba, it’s only the blue US passport and a bunch of old white guys, and probably now more Cuban Americans, with their fear of communism and land reform stopping them from enjoying a very nice bottle of state owned rum and an experience of how other people live.

    I’m glad other countries have been stepping up to help the people there, the Cuban people deserve happy and comfortable lives, and we clearly don’t have the appetite to stop starving them of that right now. Until we shake that propagandized view, I don’t imagine that will change either.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Obama I think floated an end to the shitbaggery during his second term. Like anything he proposed, it was stonewalled.

      • Maeve@kbin.earthOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I think he actually lifted the travel embargo and aimed to normalize relations but the bazillionaires and still angry exbazillionaire diaspora faces started melting so 2016 was the end of that.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I don’t know about that. Genocides don’t usually take 80 years, as the population grows. I don’t think that fits the description.

    • The_Sasswagon@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      No? That’s a weird deflection from the misery of a people, to point at other miserable people and imply, look they’re worse off so we can ignore everyone else. Or are you just lost, read a different piece, and replied to the wrong thing.

      What you’re doing sure looks like deflection using whataboutism, but why deflect something you’re not at fault for? You don’t have to help the US government defend their actions.

  • peoflor@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Cuba is terrible; its own allies have turned their backs on it and dug its own grave.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Cuba is absolutely gorgeous, and it’s a shame that the conservatives have been lying about what we are doing, at their directives for the last 50 years.

  • Alpha71@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I dunno, maybe helping to almost end the world in 1962 plays a small part in it.

    • GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Maybe study the whole story before writing. From Wikipedia:

      In 1961, the U.S. started deploying 15 Jupiter IRBM (intermediate-range ballistic missiles) nuclear missiles near Izmir, Turkey, which directly threatened cities in the western sections of the Soviet Union. These missiles were regarded by President John F. Kennedy as being of questionable strategic value; a nuclear submarine was capable of providing the same cover with both stealth and superior firepower. In the late 1950’s missile technology was well developed in the field of medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs), as opposed to ICBMs (intercontinental-ballistic missiles) which could not be kept in a state of readiness at all times.

      MRBMs represented only a small portion of the total American nuclear arsenal, but still much larger than the U.S.S.R.'s. Soviet strategists realized that some nuclear equality could be efficiently reached by placing missiles in Cuba. Soviet MRBMs on Cuban soil, with a range of 2,000 km (1,200 statute miles), could threaten Washington, DC and around half of the U.S. SAC bases (of nuclear-armed bombers), with a flight time of under twenty minutes. In addition, the U.S.'s radar warning systems oriented toward USSR would have provided little warning of a launch from Cuba.

      Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev had publicly expressed his anger at the Turkish deployment, and regarded the missiles as a personal affront. The deployment of missiles in Cuba - the first time Soviet missiles were moved outside the USSR - is commonly seen as Khrushchev’s direct response to the Turkish missiles.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Missile_Crisis

      • Alpha71@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        I am aware of the whole story. It still doesn’t change the fact that they were complicit in almost ending the world. I will say that it doesn’t excuse America’s current behavior.

    • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Maybe if the US hadn’t tried to invade Cuba the year before they wouldn’t have requested Soviet assistance. Also maybe the US shouldn’t have placed nukes in Turkey if it didn’t want the soviets to do something similar.

      • Alpha71@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        10 hours ago

        True, true, true…

        Except for Castro publicly going on about how Russia should have never backed down.

    • Weydemeyer@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      “Autarky doesn’t work” is something that all economists - from the Marxist to the Austrian - agree on. Every country must exchange the commodities and resources it can produce for the ones it can’t. The large countries blessed with large populations and an abundance of resources (USA, Russia, et al) can get away with a bit better. But a small, resource-poor island with a centuries-long history of colonial exploitation? To imply that Cuba’s economic woes stem from anything other than being mostly cut off from international trade strains credulity.

    • peoflor@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Do people think that criticizing Cuba makes you not a socialist? Is that the kind of life you want for yourself? (Eating from the garbage)

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If we got to vote for it sure. But we have no voice. This is just assholes doing asshole things.