• ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Let’s say the pre-Trump economy is worth $100 trillion, and a particular billionaire’s share is $2 billion. Let’s say Trump catastrophically decreases the economy’s value to $50 trillion, while increasing corruption such that that Trump is getting more power, and the billionaire’s share is $10 billion.

    This is followed by a collapsing market that creates a dip in share prices or private valuation, the assets of which can be bought for pennies on the dollar, eventually leading to that billionaire having $30 billion in a total economy worth $20 trillion.

    Win/win for Trump and the billionaire, at the cost of everyone else.

    That’s basically what’s happening, and will continue to happen.

    • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I’m not an economist, so here’s my ass talking, but I don’t think your example scales out. I think you’re making the mistake of equating the stock market to the economy. It isn’t.

      Not everyone wins in a failing economy. If one billionaire makes out, three more lose money.

      • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Not everyone wins in a failing economy. If one billionaire makes out, three more lose money.

        No, yeah, that’s true. But the billionaires are also competing with each other in a (perceived) zero-sum game and they believe the ones who are cozying closest to Trump will be the best ones positioned to make money - either in a corrupt or a failing economy. But every recession has been a golden opportunity for billionaires.

        Heck, in post-collapse Russia, this is how oligarchs first appeared - the “shock therapy” of the 1990s transition to a market economy dropped the value of resources to nothing, and the rich at the time bought them and became the ultra-rich. Some didn’t make it. ( Like a super-bacteria forming from the ones not killed by antibiotics, the ones that survived were even more resistant to control.)

        • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Good example, especially given that it looks like a Russian oligarchy is where we’ve been headed since 2016

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      This is followed by a collapsing market that creates a dip in share prices or private valuation

      I am not a billionaire, just an average joe lucky to be able to borrow a few thousand from my Roth 401k in order to buy oil stocks in March 2020 at 90% off.

      I earned between 15x and 20x what I invested and paid off my student loans when the market recovered.

      It’s not just for the billionaires, but you’re right, all of this is intentional and the wealthiest will profit the most.