When I’m unhappy, I feel like I’m doing life wrong. I’d rather be happy. But is happiness the point of life, or is there more to it? If I pursue happiness, mine first then for those around me, is that selfish? But if there’s a bigger purpose, then what about people with Alzheimer’s or dementia who can’t recall recent experiences or make plans?

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There’s no purpose. Do whatever you will do. There was never another option.

    Hey, it could be worse. There’s no failing per se and this is neutral (rather than hostile) towards whatever personal goal you make up.

      • BigTechMustBurn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If only life were that interesting. Sadly, we’re just insignificant specs of stardust living meaningless, pointless lives for a finite amount of years and then disappear from existence.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Maybe, does it matter? As a property of the universe it has neither predictive power nor falsifiability.

        If it is, I think it’s fair to say it’s not a human-centric simulation. I suppose it could be life-centric or intelligence-centric (Fermi paradox explanation?), but it could just as easily be an investigation into conformal field theories, and the creators don’t even realise there’s an equivalent gravitational weak field system present yet.

        I think it’s also worth asking how you define “simulation”. It’s possible to have a system who’s state can be read two different ways but in which it’s not clear which of the two is more “real”. The holographic theory I touched on there is a great example.

        • investorsexchange@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It probably matters to people who are looking for an external source of meaning, and doesn’t matter to people who are creating an internal source of meaning. In that way, it’s maybe a useful clue to what type of meaning is more valid.

          In the scenario you gave, how would you judge whether a life was well lived? How would you go about living a good life? What would you do or become to be an effective human being?

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You mean in the no-free-will purposeless-universe scenario? I think there’s no right or wrong answer, really. Every human being is simply what they are (and animal, and plant, and rock). You have to add somewhat arbitrary personal criteria to get a meaningful answer.

            Personally, I think being kind and strong is very important. That’s not very original, but I guess the interesting thing I have to say about it is that 99% of the population earnestly does that, and the reason people suck is basically down to Hanlon’s razor. To be an effective human being, don’t lie to yourself.

            • investorsexchange@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              We all lie to ourselves. But I admire people who try to lie to themselves less, who try to be honest with themselves and face reality.