• Andy@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Thanks for clarifying.

    At a glance, I don’t see a problem. Isn’t social media already a system for rating social credit?

    I think the problem with social credit scores is when they’re mandatory and can limit things like housing access. Filtering posts on opt-in social networks just sounds like a reasonable tool for moderating decentralized platforms.

    • KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      a glance, I don’t see a problem. Isn’t social media already a system for rating social credit?

      Yes and no. There’s a difference between having a centralized/agglomerated/global score (e.g. karma on Reddit) and having individual posts/comments ranked. The consequences of said centralized ranking being decided in an opaque manner by a reactionary dev.

      think the problem with social credit scores is when they’re mandatory and can limit things like housing access.

      Yes I agree FICO score is fucked up

      Filtering posts on opt-in social networks just sounds like a reasonable tool for moderating decentralized platforms.

      So is having a community driven mod team, which is having that power not centralized by a (group) of devs across multiple decentralized instances.

      To quote @[email protected]:

      I mean most cults have voluntary membership too, it doesn’t make the techniques of social control they employ any less harmful