Recently, my wife and I had a shouting match over piracy which went nowhere other than making me realize I couldn’t back up my positions on anything other than the higher-level ethics stuff.
The argument went something like this:
Wife: piracy is federal crime, federal crimes mean federal prison, i don’t want you going to federal prison
Me: thats not how that works
Wife: how do you know? What if they got a court order against you and you had to supply all your files to them
Me: incoherent monkey tantrum noises
To clarify, she is fine with piracy, she just is scared of me getting caught. And my position was “nuh uh!”
My understanding is that the biggest point of risk (of actual legal consequences, specifically) is when you are the one propagating files (because the feds will go after uploaders when able) and when using public torrents (if i forget to use a VPN, dmca snitches might send a “stop pirating” notice to my landlord who owns the router our internet goes through). Not 100% percent sure why these are the risky things, though, and I’m not sure if there’s other things i need to be on my toes about.
The argument i have more trouble with figuring out how to answer is the question of “what if the feds change their strategy for some reason and start playing whack-a-mole with individual pirates like me?” What do I do to future-proof myself? Is just using a VPN across all my devices enough?


Single person piracy is almost always a civil offense, not a criminal one so even caught you’d get at most a fine and maybe banned from the internet. This is assuming you’re in the US.
Seeding will get you caught because that’s the actual violation of the DMCA. Just downloading isn’t a violation for the downloader.
My advice is get a vpn or seedbox and use those to not have to worry about it.
Or move to a piracy method that is download only like newsgroups.
Noob here: whats a seedbox
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seedbox
This argument is unlikely to hold up in court.
It likely would, crime is distribution not viewing.