ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 days ago600 timesdiscuss.onlineexternal-linkmessage-square103fedilinkarrow-up1946arrow-down111file-text
arrow-up1935arrow-down1external-link600 timesdiscuss.onlineByteOnBikes@discuss.online to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 days agomessage-square103fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareWalterLego@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·20 hours agoThat’s the opposite. Your protecting the cable from being manipulated. OP is talking about protecting the cable from being read.
minus-squareTinidril@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·16 hours agoAssuming that the cable hadn’t already been manipulated, in which case they were protecting it from being read.
That’s the opposite. Your protecting the cable from being manipulated. OP is talking about protecting the cable from being read.
Assuming that the cable hadn’t already been manipulated, in which case they were protecting it from being read.